Weird my text didn't actually post. But it was supposed to be this:
Well, we know the 7970m beats the 675m with the same amount of video memory. But anyone know how the 675 with 4GB fairs against a 7970 with 2GB?
-
Karamazovmm Overthinking? Always!
it doesnt matter the amount of vram, it wont improve the performance, it will still be faster by a decent amount
-
The 675M (rebranded 580m) won't use memory effectively beyond 2GB, because the chip is too weak.
The 7970M will eat the 675M.
Also, I wasn't aware that a 4GB GTX 675M existed? -
-
Seems a bit odd they would even make it, if it won't use the memory above 2GB. I recall there used to be some 560s that had like 3072MB -
Maybe just to increase the buy factor.
-
-
VRAM, effectively, is a staging area where data is stored before being read out by the HDMI/whatever to be displayed on a screen. Now if you have a 1GB VRAM as opposed to a 1TB VRAM, if your GPU itself cannot fill 512MB of the ram with its architecture and clock rates, your RAM size won't matter.
-
niffcreature ex computer dyke
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
Its about as worth as attaching 1GB of vram to the 7300GT, a complete and utter waste of time.
If a fully fledged desktop GTX680 sees no noticeable increase going from 2GB to 4GB of ram then the 675M has a snowball's chance of hell of doing the same. -
Karamazovmm Overthinking? Always!
what if hell freezes over? what are the P scores of hell? tell me!
I tell you that hell in v2.0 has a p20k scores in 3dmark11, but Im counting charonte in there, so its cheating, hehehehe -
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
The snowball already melted, it's too late.
-
Karamazovmm Overthinking? Always!
damn what if we count hydaspes?
-
is there a 4GB version of GTX 675M (580M)??? :|
oh damn my bad, didnt read further down
@R3d: scroll down man, MSI is gonna release one. -
Yeah that's strange. Maybe the 4gb 675m isn't a rebranded 580m? Or maybe it's a typo?
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
No, just like the 3gb 570 and 670.
-
It is excellent for CUDA/OpenCL calculations.
-
Question: For a dominantly CAD usage laptop, should I get the 675m or the 7970? I'm looking to buy from Sager/Clevo.
-
-
Lol... not only do I find the re-branding of 580M idiotic, I find putting 4GB on it to be even more so moronic.
Why not use that extra VRAM resource material to enhance the bus, or overall performance of the gpu?
Like this it's just extra waste - oh wait, we live in an economic system that promotes wastefulness in the first place.
Sigh... as others already mentioned, putting more VRAM on the gpu unless the chip/architecture can use it effectively is pointless.
Going beyond 1.5GB or 2GB in a 'high end' mobile gpu I think would be utterly useless. -
I have read that nVidia cards are better suited for CAD stuff. True on that? -
-
-
SlickDude80 Notebook Prophet
You guys have to realize (or you probably already do) that most laptop buyers don't know jack- about laptops or videocards. 4 gigs of vram on a 580m is completely wasted...but the average non-educated buyer will have bragging rights and think his next generation 675m with 4gigs of ram will smoke all the games out there. Its great for sales...not great for performance
This just shows MSI sees that they need to do something because the 680m is still quite a ways out. Gawd forbid that they start offering ATI cards -
Lol, nvidia / MSi have truly hit rock bottom. Complete waste of time and money.
-
Id still rather have a nVidia card than an ATI lol. Yet that is a discussion for another topic.
I have to talk people outta buying flashy things all the time...what a cruel technology world it is for the uneducated it will eat you alive (and your wallet).
GeForce GTX 675M (4,096MB) vs AMD Radeon HD 7970M (2048MB)
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by Notabrawd, May 10, 2012.