The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    HM160hc Reallocated Sector Count Warning

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by Tippey764, Feb 16, 2009.

  1. Tippey764

    Tippey764 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    377
    Messages:
    1,423
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    So today i got back a dv1000 from someone who had bought it from me because of the charger was working ( minor problem all ready fixed ) while i had it i decided to check hdtune and such and i got this error under health. Is this anything to be worried about the harddrive isnt even over 200 hours. [​IMG]
     
  2. ramgen

    ramgen -- Morgan Stanley --

    Reputations:
    513
    Messages:
    1,322
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    55
    If that value is correct, then yes, you should worry. That means that your hdd is suffering from bad sectors...

    However that may not be an accurate value as in the case of "Temperature". Then there is no need to worry...


    --
     
  3. K-TRON

    K-TRON Hi, I'm Jimmy Diesel ^_^

    Reputations:
    4,412
    Messages:
    8,077
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    205
    That doesnt mean the drive has bad sectors. It basically means that the drive skipped reading a file. This could have happened when say your friend picked up your system and ran down the stairs with your system on, while it was copying files. All it means is that it tried opening something from a sector and failed, so the drive had to move it to a spare sector in reserve in order to open it.
    The threshold is 10, and your at 95, so your drive is fine.
    I wouldnt worry about it much at all.

    K-TRON
     
  4. Michel.K

    Michel.K 167WAISIQ

    Reputations:
    353
    Messages:
    1,216
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55

    No, you're incorrect.



    Usual a hard drive has like 256 to 1024 spare sectors to use, so, like 50 of them that couldn't be used isn't much.

    AFAIK, "data" is the actual value of how many it has reallocated.

    I have 29 of them on my WD3200BEKT, and it doesn't mean anything special according to me, nor WD themselves.
     
  5. ramgen

    ramgen -- Morgan Stanley --

    Reputations:
    513
    Messages:
    1,322
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    55
    http://www.ariolic.com/activesmart/smart-attributes/reallocated-sectors-count.html


    So this means that "re-allocation" of sectors is because of bad sectors. Otherwise why would the HDD re-allocate the healthy sector from somewhere else which will cause performance loss?


    --
     
  6. Michel.K

    Michel.K 167WAISIQ

    Reputations:
    353
    Messages:
    1,216
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55

    Yes, it's because of bad sectors, but every HDD has alot of spare sectors so you can have hundres reallocated without a problem.
    It's only when you get up to several hundred reallocated sectors that you can even notice performance drops (as those sectors that went bad are on the spare end of the HDD which wil get the head to move over there instead of reading where the bad sector was).

    It's nothing to worry about (as in the drive will NOT die). Worst case scenario is that performance drops, and that is when you have a huge count. It's only when you're near the max limit of spare sectors used that you should worry. All HDD's usualy get bad sectors from time to time, nothing uncommon at all, that's why the manufacturers created spare sectors to resolve the issue when getting them.

    EDIT: And i think K-TRON is thinking of "raw read error rate" or something else. Because reallocated secotors = bad sectors
     
  7. K-TRON

    K-TRON Hi, I'm Jimmy Diesel ^_^

    Reputations:
    4,412
    Messages:
    8,077
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    205
    I was just trying to explain how I would think the error would appear. Maybe my example was not very good :eek:

    K-TRON
     
  8. Michel.K

    Michel.K 167WAISIQ

    Reputations:
    353
    Messages:
    1,216
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I know exactly what you meant :) But it seems ramgen didn't :)
     
  9. K-TRON

    K-TRON Hi, I'm Jimmy Diesel ^_^

    Reputations:
    4,412
    Messages:
    8,077
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    205
    To be honest, this error also appeared on my Samsung HM160HC drive around 1300hrs of use. It hasnt caused any problems in the last month or two that the error came up. I dont think it will cause any problem.

    5900 :D

    K-TRON
     
  10. Michel.K

    Michel.K 167WAISIQ

    Reputations:
    353
    Messages:
    1,216
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Hehe :)

    I have 3316 power on hours on my WD3200BEKT as we speak :D I have my laptop running 24/7 hehe. And i got 29 of those reallocated sectors since a week ago :) Haven't had a problem with my WD3200BEKT though and the performance is still at it's sweet spot (71MB/s average sequential read)


    Congrats on 5900 while i'm coming close to 1000 :p