The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Hard Drive Performance

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by CanadianDude, Feb 2, 2007.

  1. CanadianDude

    CanadianDude Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    507
    Messages:
    1,476
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    56
    I have a question. With my old Toshiba M70 laptop, I had a 120 gb 5400 rpm hard drive in there. At one point I had downloaded so many videos that I only had about 300 mb left on the hard disk. I did however manage to get the # of processes down to about 27, to help performance.

    The thing I want to know is is there any correlation between the amount of stuff you have on your hard disk vs overall performance? (ie, startup, program loading times etc).

    Like for example would my M70 with a full hard disk perform the same as if its hard disk is relatively empty???
     
  2. Thibault

    Thibault Banned

    Reputations:
    1,079
    Messages:
    1,319
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Do you defragment your hard drive?
     
  3. CanadianDude

    CanadianDude Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    507
    Messages:
    1,476
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    56
    once a month when it was completely fulll
     
  4. Lil Mayz

    Lil Mayz Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    599
    Messages:
    1,463
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Well I guess so. If there are more bits of information on the magnetic platters, it will take longer for the disk head to find the bits of information it needs and send it to the RAM.

    However, defragmenting moves all the bits to one location, except Unmovable system files.

    It sounds like you might want to buy an eSata external Hard Drive or something to store all that video :p
     
  5. Metamorphical

    Metamorphical Good computer user

    Reputations:
    2,618
    Messages:
    2,194
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    56
    I'm going to move this thread to the hardware forum. It qualifies for being on topic and it will get more responses there.
     
  6. John Ratsey

    John Ratsey Moderately inquisitive Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    7,197
    Messages:
    28,841
    Likes Received:
    2,166
    Trophy Points:
    581
    One contributory factor may be a fragmented swap file. If you have the default setting of letting Windows resize the swap file as needed then it will become progressively fragmented. The swap file is best if it is in one block and near to start of the HDD where transfer rates are the fastest.

    In fact, as the HDD fills up and the recent files go near the end, they are also in the place where transfer rates are the slowest, often half the speed of the fast end of the disk. Run HDtune and see how the speed drops across the disk.

    John
     
  7. hehe299792458

    hehe299792458 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    175
    Messages:
    1,571
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    If you only have 100mb left on the HD, then obviously performance is going to suffer. I'd say leave at least 5GB on their in case the computer has to move something around. If you for instance, have 6Gb and DEFRAGMENT regularly, then the performance is not going to be affected much (relative an most empty one). Also, The Windows Defrag software sucks. Get something like Diskeeper Pro.