Help me with some benchmarks please! Q9xx, Pxxxx, Txxx, i7, etc..

Nice ramgen! Almost took the top spot for C2D, close one!

 

I did some D900F picture search in Google, and I think it doesn't look too bad after all... so I will probably get it. I mean, it sure is thick and heavy, but I'm so intrigued with all that power

I hope a night's sleep will help me make my mind up...heheheeh

If I do get it I'll post my scores...

 

That's what I thought, it doesn't look *that* bad, but then I got out the measuring tape and compared it to my current laptop. Over an inch thicker, I just can't deal with that, especially since it has those little feet it sits on as well. To high up, and too chunky, but if you can handle that, it's a beast of machine power wise. Hands down the most powerful laptop on the planet right now.

 

Here is my result for D901C, Q9550S & 9800M GTX:
http://forum.notebookreview.com/gallery/uploads/244214/D901C-Fritz-Chess-Bench-Q9550S-9800M_GTX.jpg

@Brandon
You should also do a thread for BarsWF benches.

 

Great idea! I'll put one together.

 

\

there u go

 

This is mine with T7700 @2.4GHz

Relative Speed: 6.74
Knps: 3236

 

Core i7-820QM, 1.73 GHz with 8 total "cores" running
High performance on battery (not plugged)
8 GB DDR3 RAM
Windows 7 Pro x64

And how the heck did an i7-720QM beat my 820QM?

 

Stock clocked and stock volted t9300, Win 7 64-bit, 4gb 667 ram, no other programs running in background.

 

Not sure if showing your Product ID is the safest thing to do.

 

Win7 32bit, 3 GB Ram

 

Maybe because you're running on battery?

 

Ok, I'm about to test my new T8100. Going to test it at 2.75ghz.
Wish me luck (not sure if this CPU is going to make it that far).

 

Turns out my T8100 is a great overclocker. The voltage is a bit low. Unlike my t7300.

Anyway, results:

moral hazard - 6.20/ 2978 - T8100 2.1GHZ
moral hazard - 7.78 / 3736 - T8100 OC 2.62GHZ 250mhz FSB

I wish I had more voltage, could probably get 2.8ghz.
Though the T8100 does run a lot cooler than the T7300.


EDIT: Do you think I should bench my T5250, lol

 

OK, new result. Stock i7-820QM and 8 GB DDR3, but this time on AC.

 

AC power makes a bit of a difference, eh Fred?

 

See, there you go. Above BrandonSi's 720QM, although short of SUADE8880's... maybe you have some extra background processes running?

 

Yes, I imagine that's the case. I bet if he closed everything out, browser, background processes, etc, he'd be up there with Suade.

 

Actually not really any background processes. I could of course boot into safe mode and try it.

 

I think the test is a bit dependent on the video card too, so that might explain the differences.

 

Video card should make no difference, we're just dealing with positional analysis on a chess board, and obviously there's no graphics involved at all in the benchmark.

 

T9600 @:

2.8 GHz
8.04/3857

3.0 GHz
8.67/4163

3.2 GHz
9.24/4434

 

Also posted this in http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?p=5623283#post5623283


Not sure why the different results, I have Deep Fritz 11, ran the Benchmark (Lists for 8 Processors) using Windows 7 64 Bit Home Premium and got the following;

13.17 / 6323 kN/s

Full Spec in Sig below


As a comparison my Desktop runs a Q6600 overclocked to 2.95Ghz, 8GB PC 800 DC DDR2 RAM, Windows 7 Professional 64 Bit scores;

16.17 / 7763 kN/s

 

Interesting Snarl.. I have Deep Fritz 11 and Fritz 12 as well, however I've always used the stand-alone benchmark utility, not the built in one. I'm curious if there's a difference..

Would you mind running the stand-alone benchmark and posting a screen shot? It's not that I don't believe you (I do!) it's just that your score is a bit high for the the 720QM. I'll still add your scores though.. no worries!

 

BrandonSI, I'm not sure If I can post Screenies but I'll give it a try. I used the built in Benchmark with my copy of Deep Fritz 11, I missed the fact that there's a stand alone bench mark utility (sorry I should have caught that) so I'll download as you indicated and re-run test. Out of curiosity do your results match between the Built in Utility and the stand alone one ?

Also as an FYI my M15x is new (2 Weeks) and I have not changed any basic settings i.e. Clocks etc.. it's all stock with the exception of the AntiVirus, I installed Kaspersky Stand alone AV (Protection Paused during benchmark) and removed Mcafee's Suite. I'm using Windows Firewall and Defender with Kaspersky's.

 

Can I still post?

Using Intel Core i7 720QM at 1.6GHz, all 8 Cores to be used on the test:
Relative Speed 11.23
Kilo nodes per second 5388
100% CPU usage

4 cores results:
9.17
4400
52% CPU usage

2 cores results:
5.45
2614
26% CPU Usage

1 core results:
3.21
1540
15% CPU usage

Hope this helps!

 

BrandonSI, I have downloaded the Stand Alone Benchmark from the Link you provided and re-run twice score as follows;

Stand Alone Fritz Benchmark
13.06 / 6270
13.14 / 6306


Built in Deep Fritz Benchmark
13.18 / 6327
13.24 / 6353

I have used Snipping Tool to capture the 4 Screen Shots, PM me with your E-mail and I'll E-mail them to you, file sizes are 35 to 71 KB Each so not very big.

 

Thanks Snarl! I hadn't compared the two, actually, I've always just run the stand-alone benchmark! I appreciate the screen-shots, but I think your consistent results are good enough. If you want to share them, you can just add a new post and put them as an attachment on your post, but I don't need them for any specific reason. I'll add your highest score to the list, thanks again for all the help!

Just out of curiosity, are you running XP?

 

No, Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bit on my Laptop (M15x)

 

Testing my FSB increase with my QX9300 at 3163MHz:

Max temp of 75 degrees.

 

Q9200 in XP mode only uses 1 core.

 

Interesting! I believe this is a limitation of the crippled Virtual PC technology which is behind "XP Mode". You could try setting processor affinity and see if you can select multiple cores to run XP Mode under, but I'm not sure it will work.

If you used VMWare (and I believe, even the latest version of Virtual PC), you will have the option to choose how many cores to allocate to a VM.

 

Don't think more than 512 RAM or more than 1 processor can be selected.

 

I win!
Intel Core i7 920 D0 OC to 3.4ghz running MAX temp 65C.
25.21
12100

edit, rebooted my machine... now:
25.70
12321

 

Ran cpuz at the same time as fritz chess benchmark in xp mode and that single core got over 4000mhz a couple times. Tried to take a screenshot but it dropped back down both times that I tried.

 

here's another one, stock T8100 ES (Q8LB)

Relative speed: 6.10
Knps : 2926

 

Your T8100 has a higher stock voltage then myne. That's strange. I guess it's because you have an ES.

 

Hi moral hazard, what's your stock voltage ??
now I'm confuse on which to keep, T7700 or the ES T8100.. I made new thread on that

 

My stock voltage was 1.1250V for my T8100.
My stock voltage when IDA was enabled was 1.2000V.

 

Thanks yuio! Can you confirm that's a D900F, then, and not a desktop?

 

i7 920XM at 2.0GHz,
8 Cores
Relative Speed 17.45
Kilo nodes per second 8375
100% CPU usage
see attached..

 

lol, nay, I was seeing if anyone would catch me... it's a desktop .

 

No problem, I'll add you to the desktop section, I'm pretty sure you're the highest score, regardless!

 

Adding my new T9300!

Relative speed: 7.34
knps: 3522

 

Curse you! I can only get to about 3Ghz safely..

 

http://forum.notebookreview.com/showpost.php?p=5738612&postcount=24

 

What? It gets too hot or it crashes? I know of someone who was running it at 4.2Ghz, on water of course...

 

QX9300 @ 2,53GHz
Relative speed: 14.37
Kilo nodes per second: 6898

 

I prefer not to go over 65C max load, im sure its ok if im not over-volting, im just a temp nazi lol.