The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Hitachi TravelStar 7K200

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by stringbeans85, Oct 3, 2007.

  1. stringbeans85

    stringbeans85 Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Greetings Everyone!

    I had a question regarding the TravelStar 7K200. According to the PDF file I've included which comes from the Hitachi website. It mentions only the 100gb and 200gb version having media transfer rate of 876ms/sec. While the 120gb and 160gb version has a media transfer rate 695ms/sec. Is it correct to assume that to get the maximized benefits you should stick with either a 100gb or 200gb version?

    http://tinyurl.com/2vqkuk
     
  2. K-TRON

    K-TRON Hi, I'm Jimmy Diesel ^_^

    Reputations:
    4,412
    Messages:
    8,077
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    205
    The reason that there is a difference in the sustained transfer rate, is that every 7K200 hdd utilize the same platters. The 100Gb uses 1 platter and the 200Gb uses 2 platters. The capacities of 120 and 160gb are possible because the hard drive heads have a limited motion. Since the heads are limited in movement, space decreases, and so does centripetal acceleration and thus speed is affected. The manufacturers do this in order to save money. All of the platters are the same.

    K-TRON
     
  3. John Ratsey

    John Ratsey Moderately inquisitive Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    7,197
    Messages:
    28,841
    Likes Received:
    2,166
    Trophy Points:
    581
    I had always assumed that the lower capacities in a HDD family range were the result of lower data densities but it is also possible that less of the surface area is used (this would enable platters with some defects to still be sold).

    However, the bottom line is that the best data transfer rate comes from the maximum data density on one platter. However, note that the maximum data transfer rate only applies to the fastest part of the HDDs. The slowest part (the inner tracks) has a transfer rate that is usually about 50% of the peak.

    John