The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    How do you interpret benchmark scores?

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by lzrsfa, Dec 20, 2009.

  1. lzrsfa

    lzrsfa Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    149
    Messages:
    226
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I found these benchmark scores on cpubenchmark.net:

    Intel Pentium M 725: 395
    Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300: 1014

    Does this mean that the SU7300 is roughly 3 times faster than the Pentium M 725?
     
  2. DetlevCM

    DetlevCM Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    4,843
    Messages:
    8,389
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    205
    phew...

    Well, I'd rather say you can say that it can perform three times as many calculations in a given time interval.

    You're also comparing a single core to a dual core if I'm not mistaken.

    The most basic conclusion is though, that the SU7300 is more than twice as powerful.

    Also, what kind of benchmark was it? Single threaded, dual threaded?
     
  3. lzrsfa

    lzrsfa Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    149
    Messages:
    226
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Good question...I have no idea :eek:

    Here is a description of the test from the website:

     
  4. DetlevCM

    DetlevCM Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    4,843
    Messages:
    8,389
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    205
    OK.... good :) that's good news - now how is the score calculated?

    The single core one is easy.

    The Dual Core one - is the result for every core added together? Or is that the average between cores?

    If its all cores added, then its a difficult one, if its the average between cores then you can divide and say its 3,x times better.
     
  5. lzrsfa

    lzrsfa Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    149
    Messages:
    226
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Thanks! From the website description it appears it is the latter :)

     
  6. DetlevCM

    DetlevCM Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    4,843
    Messages:
    8,389
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    205
    I didn't quite actually think it through - if its the average between cores then its 3,x times better per core.

    So for a task with two threads it would be 3,x * 2 times better than the single core.
     
  7. sean473

    sean473 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    613
    Messages:
    6,705
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    it is faster but not way faster... compared to a normal core 2 duo...