How to undervolt the lowet multiplier?

My laptop uses cpu T6500 2.1Ghz, 2MB. The OS is windows 7 64bit.
My default Vcore levels are 0.925 for lowest multiplier 6.0, and 1.15 for highest multiplier.
I have managed to undervolt the highest Vcore (1.15) to 0.925 (as much as the lowest multiplier's) using RMClock and now my system is stable (orthos for 2 hours).
But now I want to undervolt the lowest multiplier Vcore to lower than 0.925, because you can see that now my lowest Vcore is similar to the highest.
Is anyone able to lower the lowest multiplier's voltage with RMClock?
I have discovered the way to customize the lowest Vcore, but I cannot change it.

My CPU isn't recognized by RMClock since it based on the 45nm technology CPU. Is that the reason for the problem?

 

You would probably only have one option.

Here:
http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=390696

 

Thanks, but it's so complicated. I even cannot read the whole thread.

 

I understand, probably not worth the effort.
But there is another thread you may be interested in:
http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?p=3663425

So from what I can tell, you should run at the highest multi that has the lowest VID (in your case run full speed all the time).

 

Do you mean that if my lowest Vcore is as high as the highest one, then I should lock the multiplier of 6 to 10, and only run at mutilplier 10.5 since it consumes the power and issues heat like the lower multipliers do? And my laptop is always at the highest performance. Is that right?

 

That is right.

 

I have a T6400 undervolted to 0.925 across all multipliers also. I tried locking the processor on 10x all the time but I found that it generates more heat than at 6x. I know the voltages are the same for both multipliers (which means power consumption should be the same between 6x and 10x) but somehow I have a feeling more heat means it's using more energy and also using more energy to cool the CPU with fans. At the end of the day, I just let the system throttle between 6x and 10x and the core vid always stays on 0.925.

I do wish I can go lower than 0.925v with just software undervolting but I guess any lower is venturing into CULV territory. Anyone know the lowest vcore for the P8xxx chips? I'm thinking about upgrading only if they can go down to 0.850v with undervolting...

 

Higher clock speed = higher power consumption... doubt the P series will do much better than what you've already done.

 

Ah, alright. Thanks for the info.

+rep

Will go for a CULV in the future.

 

Now I also let the CPU function at the range from 6 to 10.5 of multiplier.
I think that RMClock doesn't wokr wel with the 45nm technology of CPU.
I saw a guy which has a T7500 was able to lower even the frequency and his CPU now works at 600MHZ at the Vcore of 0.85.

 

It's not a problem with RMclock.
It is what is programed into your BIOS.

Because no matter what tool you use (crystalcpuid or whatever) you still can't go lower.

I have tried both merom (65nm) and penryn (45nm) cpus, you are right, the penryn CPUs wont go lower than 0.9500 without a pin mod.

But the 45nm cpus do still run cooler (a lot cooler).