The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Intel Atom Benchmarks

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by CeeNote, Jun 3, 2008.

  1. CeeNote

    CeeNote Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    780
    Messages:
    2,072
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I don't know if this has been posted yet but I just found a few Atom benchmarks used in the EEE Box. I'm actually kinda disappointed seeing how much faster the Celeron 420 (1.6GHz) is compared to the 1.6GHz Atom.

    http://anandtech.com/systems/showdoc.aspx?i=3321&p=7
     
  2. Iceman0124

    Iceman0124 More news from nowhere

    Reputations:
    1,133
    Messages:
    3,548
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    The atom isnt made for power, its made to run cool and use extremely limited power, checkout the overview of the atom on anandtech, I'm really looking forward to this chip personally for handheld pc's such as the nokia n800 internet tablet, its loads more powerful than the 400mhz ARM cpu thats in it now, and consumes considerably less power, they showed a demo of an 800mhz model running UT2K3 at high settings flawlessly without a heatsink and it barely got warm, its a capeable chip, if you need raw power, thats what the core2 lineup is for, atom offers good performance for extremely low heat and power usage. They "could" make it more powerful, but the goal here is as low heat and power consuption as possible while still getting the job done. Personally I'm pretty excited about the chip.

    "The Intel Atom was the first Intel CPU to redefine the rule of thumb and now the requirement is that a designer may add a feature if it yields a 1% increase in performance for at most a 1% increase in power consumption. It's a pretty revolutionary change and it's one that will be seen in other Intel architectures as well (Nehalem comes to mind), but Atom was the first."

    http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc.aspx?i=3276&p=6
     
  3. John Ratsey

    John Ratsey Moderately inquisitive Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    7,197
    Messages:
    28,841
    Likes Received:
    2,166
    Trophy Points:
    581
    Interesting. In some tests the 1.6GHz similar to an 800MHz Pentium M.

    John
     
  4. tumnasgt

    tumnasgt Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    80
    Messages:
    635
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Ugh, and I was just b****ing about how damn slow this Celeron 540 1.86GHz is. Core 2 ULV for me please.
     
  5. Iceman0124

    Iceman0124 More news from nowhere

    Reputations:
    1,133
    Messages:
    3,548
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    Power needs power, if the atom catches on though, we could have some serious low power chips in the upcoming generations.
     
  6. wave

    wave Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    813
    Messages:
    2,563
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
  7. Brian@EWIZ

    Brian@EWIZ Company Representative

    Reputations:
    25
    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    half the performance double the battery life.