The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Intel Core 2 Duo 1.83GHz=good enough?

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by troyman21, Mar 28, 2008.

  1. troyman21

    troyman21 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    1
    Messages:
    196
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I remade this thread because I didnt' get the right answers on my other one and things got screwed up. So...

    I'm just curious if 1.83GHz for Intel Core 2 Duo makes for great performance and if it has good "future-proof"? I plan on getting a Dell Inspiron 1720 with this processor, which I plan on owning for at least 3-4 years. I could upgrade to 2.0GHz but it costs quite a lot of extra money and I don't wanna spend extra for something I may not need, so I'm wondering if 1.83GHz with Intel Core 2 Duo is, well, whatever I just said...
     
  2. K-TRON

    K-TRON Hi, I'm Jimmy Diesel ^_^

    Reputations:
    4,412
    Messages:
    8,077
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    205
    The 1.83Ghz processor will have enough power for your needs 3-4 years down the road from now, if you are not a gamer.
    Gamers tend to want the fastest everything, so a 1.83Ghz processor may not be enough for their games.
    If you use your system for homework, email, internet and light gaming, than the 1.83Ghz processor will be plenty for you.

    K-TRON
     
  3. krazyphire

    krazyphire Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    104
    Messages:
    290
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    For a Moderate user that Core 2 Duo in itself will be future proof for quite a while. The Clock speed itself is up to you. :)
     
  4. ahl395

    ahl395 Ahlball

    Reputations:
    3,867
    Messages:
    8,218
    Likes Received:
    72
    Trophy Points:
    216
    the difference between 1.83 and 2.0 Ghz is practically unnoticeble. I wouldn't worry about it, it will work for a good 2 or 3 years before coming outdated.
     
  5. troyman21

    troyman21 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    1
    Messages:
    196
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I actually will be doing some gaming. Maybe some standard-spec games and will play some FPS games, which are usually med/high spec...

    All together, I'm doing slightly moderate gaming, homewoork, internet, and email...
     
  6. K-TRON

    K-TRON Hi, I'm Jimmy Diesel ^_^

    Reputations:
    4,412
    Messages:
    8,077
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    205
    How much is the price jump to get the T7250?

    If its more than $50-75 than I wouldnt recommend getting a T7250.

    If you are gaming, a good graphics card makes more of a difference than the cpu.

    K-TRON
     
  7. Diablo

    Diablo Metalhead

    Reputations:
    772
    Messages:
    1,471
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56
    like i said in the other thread...i play crysis at 1440 x 900 resolution with the settings on low and average about 35fps while playing. i have a 1.83ghz C2D and its plenty fast enough for my needs otherwise (email, internet, downloads...)
     
  8. LoneWolf15

    LoneWolf15 The Chairman

    Reputations:
    976
    Messages:
    1,537
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    55
    It's entirely dependent on the applications you run. Is it mostly word processing/web browsing, or are you a Photoshop junkie?

    Note that for games, graphics card is a much more important choice than CPU, though that too depends on what you mean by "light gaming". If you're gaming, I'd make the GPU your priority before the CPU.

    If you plan on doing regular heavy work with Adobe apps, medium-duty video editing or heavier, any audio/video encoding or 3d rendering/raytracing, then the upgrade makes sense. Otherwise, a 1.83 Core 2 Duo is fast enough for almost all tasks; consider that older Pentium M laptops still handle most light-to-medium tasks extremely well, and that a Core 2 Duo beats a Pentium M hands down.

    Also consider that with the money you save, you could beef up the RAM in the system, which is usually a bigger benefit than upping the CPU speed. And do compare the Inspiron 1720 to the similar Vostro 1700 in Dell Small Business; it might be cheaper.