Intel SSD 320 G3 Performance

I really think NBR should get dips on first productions as many of the big desktops sites, i mean this is the biggest laptop site, this were oriented for laptops.... now its for any high end setup, but still i think people in NBR will test them in laptops where we can even find weakness with chipsets and probably whats better for pure laptops standpoints, i think phil should get some and do some reviews for NBR on laptops.

 

Intel 320 300GB in real world benchmarks.
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB SSD Review > Benchmarks: Real-World Applications - TechSpot Reviews

Copy speeds are good, booting and launching doesn't look so good.

 

Phil, when limited to SATA2 SSD's - it performs on par to them (of course the SATA3 SSD's will be superior on SATA3 connections).

The bootup times don't look as impressive, I agree - but overall this is solid performance from the 'refreshed' G2 technology. At least for its target market of SATA2 platforms.

 

I'm surprised Samsung 470 is so much faster.

 

And Kingston closely followed. I faintly remember most reviews didn't show Kingston as a top performer.

 

Kingston V+ only looks good in reviews that do real world benchmarks like Techreport for example. (this is the older V+, not the 100)

A look at new SSDs from Corsair, Kingston, Plextor, and WD - The Tech Report - Page 6

I am surprised by the Kingston V 100. I haven't seen much of that drive.

 

Came across some more 80GB benchmarks.

Intel 320


Intel X25m


Source: http://en.expreview.com/2011/03/23/world-exclusive-review-intel-g3-ssd-80gb/15569.html/5