The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Intel Xeon

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by sheff159, Sep 14, 2006.

  1. sheff159

    sheff159 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    77
    Messages:
    880
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Ok I know that the Core and Core 2 are the main consumer grade processor now. I also know about the Xeon processor, and that its on high end workstations and servers. But how powerful are these things? How do they compare to say a Core or Core 2 in performance, heat, power consumption? Im not looking into buying one, im just curious.
     
  2. Budding

    Budding Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,686
    Messages:
    3,982
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    They use about twice (sometimes more) as much power as the Core CPUs, have about twice as much cache (the real powerful ones can have even more cache, 16MB+ L3 cache), support a lot of server technologies like Intel VT for domains, and you can have them work in parallel on a server (quad core ftw).

    All pure overkill for the every day consumer. Although AMD Opterons (AMD's server CPU) are quite good when used as normal desktop CPUs.