The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Intel shows roadmap through 2022

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by Jayayess1190, Aug 24, 2009.

  1. Jayayess1190

    Jayayess1190 Waiting on Intel Cannonlake

    Reputations:
    4,009
    Messages:
    6,712
    Likes Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    216
    Link 2011 with Ivy Bridge is when quad core becomes mainstream, after that :eek:!

    [​IMG]
     
    Jayayess1190, Aug 24, 2009
    #1
  2. Kamin_Majere

    Kamin_Majere =][= Ordo Hereticus

    Reputations:
    1,522
    Messages:
    2,680
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Looks like Intel expects to dump alot of R&D money into printing processes... theres no way what exists now can go below 16nm.

    but 4nm... thats insane. :eek:
     
    Kamin_Majere, Aug 24, 2009
    #2
  3. chrixx

    chrixx Product Specialist NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    641
    Messages:
    1,859
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    So what happens after 2022? Processors become invisible?
     
    chrixx, Aug 24, 2009
    #3
  4. makaveli72

    makaveli72 Eat.My.Shorts

    Reputations:
    1,235
    Messages:
    2,108
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Holy crap, i'm not buying another notebook until 2022! :eek:

    See....this is why I don't want to see what's set for the future. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
     
    makaveli72, Aug 24, 2009
    #4
  5. Darth Bane

    Darth Bane Dark Lord of the Sith

    Reputations:
    506
    Messages:
    2,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I completely agree :D
     
    Darth Bane, Aug 24, 2009
    #5
  6. kisetsu17

    kisetsu17 Took me long enough

    Reputations:
    289
    Messages:
    780
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Agree.

    Thing is, when you know what lies in the future for IT-related items, and you look at a tech item being currently promoted and then something would bug you--it would feel as though you're looking 10 years back in time! Sucks big time, man. Actually right now I'm feeling that the tablet PC's and multitouch screens coming out right now have already been around since 2000! Meh. :rolleyes:
     
    kisetsu17, Aug 24, 2009
    #6
  7. Nixus

    Nixus Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    75
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Disagree!! Buy them all!!
     
    Nixus, Aug 24, 2009
    #7
  8. Howitzer225

    Howitzer225 Death Company Dreadnought

    Reputations:
    552
    Messages:
    1,617
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    56
    And then after 2022, CPUs go subatomic. :p
     
    Howitzer225, Aug 31, 2009
    #8
  9. JWnFL

    JWnFL Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    234
    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I am quoting... here for give me..

    "The roadmap features a light-blue seperation, to which Intel responded that the tick-tock strategy will be under fire after 2012. Though transistors of 16 and even 11 nm are theoretically possible at this point, the 8 nm process will require another technological breakthrough. It's still unclear how transistors at this size are to be realised. The blue part of the roadmap is to be perceived as an extrapolation of the results of past years.

    Apart from this promising, but rather abstract roadmap, Intel also showed some facts about the 32nm process. Mentioned were the wafer production costs, which are similar to those of the 45nm process, as well as the sales figures of the second quarter and the announcement of two new production facilities in Asia."

    I thought this should be brought to the forefront of the discussion.

    Be well, JW
     
    JWnFL, Aug 31, 2009
    #9