Some said this on one of the boards, which scared me because I bought a Seagate Momentus 7200.2 160GB hard drive to replace the 250GB (5400RPM) one that will come with my dell laptop?
Are they really the same speed or does that guy not know what he's talking about.
-
-
Well, I won't be very technical and stuff, and I have no benchies on those drives
But you would have been better of buying a Hitachi 200GB 7K200 or a WD3200BEVT.
The real-world performance will be similar but the 7200RPM might beat the 5400RPM drive in synthetic benchies by a small margin, but the 7200.2 will consume more power and produce more heat and noise than the 5400RPM drive. -
Look for the 1 platter 7200RPM drive, that will definitely be faster. Plus it will consume less energy and less heat.
-
Commander Wolf can i haz broadwell?
The throughput on smaller 7200RPM drives will usually turn out to be similar to the throughput on larger 5400RPM drives, but the seek times on the 7200RPM drives will always be faster.
-
The Seagate 7200.2 160GB outperforms all 250GB/5400rpm drives in all non synthetic benchmarks here:
http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/...k-pattern,693.html?p=1889,1885,1904,1914,1890
The 250GB/5400 rpm drives perform better in synthetic benchmarks.
Synthetic benchmarks are usually not the best way of predicting real life performance. -
The guy you are talking about was likely trying to get across higher data density can overcome rotational speed for sustained read/writes. That is correct. In your specific example I don't think it does and as commander said seek times are faster with higher RPM drive. So the point is valid the comparison and conclusion could be wrong.
Is a 250GB @ 5400RPM same speed as 160GB @ 7200RPM?
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by fairtrade55, Aug 9, 2008.