The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Is hi-res important?

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by hooper1, Jan 21, 2008.

  1. hooper1

    hooper1 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    9
    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I'm looking at buying a laptop with 1280x800, 1440x900 or 1680x1050 resolution. Assuming I want to keep the laptop for 4+ years, will the higher resolution buy me anything?
     
  2. Lithus

    Lithus NBR Janitor

    Reputations:
    5,504
    Messages:
    9,788
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    More real estate. More screen area.
     
  3. martyp

    martyp Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    10
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Hi,

    I recently bought a Sony VAIO AR notebook with a 17" screen and a res of 1440x900. Personally, I think this is the best res for a 17" screen.

    I have setup a Dell and Rock notebooks at work with a 17" 1920x1200 res, and this is just too high for comfortable viewing I feel.

    A desktop 17"/19" TFT uses 1440x900 and 1920x1200 is only available on 23"/27" desktop monitors.

    I do work with lots of digital images and still find 1440x900 OK for this purpose.

    I would say go and take a look at different resolutions for yourself and see whats best for you.

    Hope this helps.
     
  4. Dreamer

    Dreamer The Bad Boy

    Reputations:
    2,699
    Messages:
    5,621
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    More garbage on the desktop... :p

    The screen resolution is a personal preference, so go and check it out in person, and no it won't buy you anything besides more pixels on the screen... lol :D

    Personally, I like the WSXGA+ resolution...
     
  5. Johnny T

    Johnny T Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    6,092
    Messages:
    12,975
    Likes Received:
    201
    Trophy Points:
    481
    Me like WXGA+ :D I suggest you to go to a computer store to have a look at different resolutions and see which one you prefer. :)
     
  6. K-TRON

    K-TRON Hi, I'm Jimmy Diesel ^_^

    Reputations:
    4,412
    Messages:
    8,077
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    205
    I would not personally settle with under 1680 x 1050, as you really loose the amount of workspace.

    If you do alot of design work, like cad, photoshop, video editing, where the programs have hundreds of tabs, one with a higher resolution screen has a clear advantage.
    If you do just web browsing and typing, then 1280 x 800 should be fine.

    K-TRON
     
  7. outofthisworld

    outofthisworld Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    11
    Messages:
    93
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    1280x800 on a 15.4" widescreen gives a DPI of 98

    1440x900 on a 17" widescreen gives a DPI of 100

    I personally think those are the sweet spots, and are also very affordable. No small text, no eye strain, no need to zoom into web pages or increase the text size in the OS manually (i know you can do that in Vista).
     
  8. Lithus

    Lithus NBR Janitor

    Reputations:
    5,504
    Messages:
    9,788
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    A common misperception is that text is too small on WSXGA+. Absolutely not true. If you have normal eyesight, or corrected eyesight to 20/40, you will easily be able to read text on a WSXGA+ screen from 2 arms-lengths away.
     
  9. Razor2

    Razor2 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    107
    Messages:
    914
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    31
    1680x1050 could be straining for some people on 15,4", even with decent vision, but 1440x900 is perfect. A good compromise between resolution and large enough fonts.

    By the way it could become standard pretty soon on 15,4 with screen prices dropping and if it becomes available for even 13,3".
     
  10. Illegal Operation

    Illegal Operation Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    70
    Messages:
    514
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I have perfect eyesight and I can say that WSXGA+ is too small for extended text viewing. Although the op did not mention a specific screen size, I am referring to a 15.4" or smaller. I use a WXGA+ on the 15.4" and I look at text for many hours straight during a day. It does begin to strain the eyes after prolonged use, not to say that it is unreadable though. I would not imagine going to a higher resolution unless it was a bigger screen size. I think an optimal screen size will depend on your personal needs. For photo editing, watching movies, or things that can benefit from more detail, go for higher res. However, if you plan on reading lots of text for extended periods, lower is better IMO. Difference to me in real estate is negligable from WXGA+ to WSXGA+. It's not an earth shattering difference.
     
  11. wrighton

    wrighton Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    10
    Messages:
    181
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    This is a key factor in any purchasing decision I make. I spend seven or eight hours a day writing. I wear fairly weak glasses for reading. I don't want to have to deal with eyestrain and headaches.

    I really like the Lenovo T61P, for example, but the WSXGA+ resolution of its screens count against it. It's hard to be sure, though, since it's just about impossible to find a 15.4" laptop with WSXGA+ resolution around here.
     
  12. outofthisworld

    outofthisworld Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    11
    Messages:
    93
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Its not common mis(conception/perception) when I've seen a 17" at 1920x1200 and google's home page is the size of a biscuit.

    I don't mean to be rude, so i'll leave it there, but of course the most important thing is to see a screen and use it. Then each to their own.

    I chose 1440x900.on the Dell 1720, not only because i am happy with 1280x800 on my 15.4", but also because i'd rather be able to game in near full resolution. Furthermore, i can't imagine excel spreadsheets are fun to read at such a high resolution.