I was thinking about using an SSD for my main hard drive. I don't really watch movies or have a huge music collection so I don't really need a lot of storage.
But I do work with a lot of raw images. If I do about 10gb of writing onto a x25m a week would that be overly strenuous and kill the drive prematurely is is that within the acceptable amount of stress?
Thanks for your help fellas.
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
Intel's drives are proven to have low write aplification and at that level of writing onto one of their larger drives it should still last longer than a regular hard drive.
Intel said 100GB per day would give you 5 years with their gen 1 drives. Its likely a bit less for the gen 2 but not far off. -
So 10gb a week should be okay for 3-4 years? Great.
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
100GB/day = 700GB a week.
10GB/week = 1/70th of 100GB/day
5x70 = 350 years.
I think it might last longer than you. -
Ahhh, hand-me down SSDs. The thing that children always dream of.
-
-
There is less wear than you think from those(Just watch the write counter on the toolbox - less change than expected with all the temp files from panoramas in Photoshop and the 10GB (9,something) of photos from last Friday... + normal use)
I'm editing 5D MK II RAW files on my Vaio with no worries - Intels are fine with that.
Is it okay for an SSD to go through medium-heavy write cycles?
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by Meever, Jul 18, 2010.