Measure your Dual/Multi Core Notebook CPU Speed - Bye Bye to SuperPI

Is there a limit for how old the processor can be? I seriously want to post the time that my PII 366 MHz will use. (only the 32 MB one.. 1024MB would be lol)

 

Nothing wrong with the vintage stuff. Let's see it!

 

Redid it got 220.606 sec 32M (speed test).

Then I did it again with only 39 processes running: 196.531 sec

 

Well well well. I ran WPrime on my PII P-E 366 MHz. Something strange happened in the 1024 MB test.. not sure what. (See attachment)

For 32 MB though: 572.322 secs

Specs:
364.2 MHz
256 KB L2
256 MD SDRAM @ 66.2 MHz @ 2-2-2-0
Windows 2000 Pro

 

^I was going to say overflow until I remembered John Ratsey's 5.92 hour 1024M score.

I've got a slight improvement on my 18th place Single-Core Pentium IV 2.66 HP 764n desktop. New score of 119.031 for 32M. Got it down to 22 processes before running it, that's a new record low for processes. At first when I knocked it down to 38 I got a worse score than when I did it before with 51 - probably the new firewall software I have.

 

Updated... again.

We got a new record for fastest recorded time for mobile CPU:

(for notebook with mobile CPU)
Chicken Royale - ASUS W7S

9.)	Chicken Royale	Intel Core 2 Duo CPU T7500@ 2.20GHz	NB: ASUS W7S	Vista Home Premium	36.862s	1183.651s

 

Actually, my PII was an HP Omnibook 4150, not a desktop Although the battery doesn't work anymore, so it essentially is a desktop that has to stay plugged in the whole time...

Oh, and it was Pentium II Performance-Enhanced, I might add. Although I really haven't seen the enhanced performance.

 

got it, thanks.

 

nice time!

 

my super pi original

 

A bit large......

 

SuperPI is still in accurate and should not be used to compared multi-core CPUs

 

To be fair, SuperPI is still a decent test of the power of a core's microarchitecture.

 

its only a single-threaded program... it does not even stress multi-core CPU's...

for a single-core CPU its a great utility to test stability....

for multi-core CPU's..... its pretty much untrusted for stress tests and burn-ins.

Thats why wPrime and other multi-threaded programs are better suited for today's current era of multi-cores.

 

Lol, nice showing off your warez.

Keygen Avast Pro 4.7.892

 

Hi folks,

i've made a little upgrade ---> Turion64 X2 TL-66.
Here are the results.



exxxer

 

wow nice score... can you click the Submit Scores.... and choose Team NBR

Thats gonna give NBR some rep.

 

The TL's are rockin'! Nice score.

 

Boy am I the best?
Well whatever...

86,14s on 22 months old Acer Aspire 5024WLMi on Vista Ultimate 32bit.

 

I thought it might me interesting to see how fast the Linux WINE (non)emulator works. I am using Ubuntu Feisty Fawn 7.04 on a BenQ S41 notebook. My results are quite astonishing.


That puts me in 17th place ahead of a T7500!

 

Unless Wprime makes a bunch of Windows system calls, which I doubt, you shouldn't expect any slowdown from using WINE.

 

Redid it:

 

I got a 68.53 second time with a Macbook Pro

Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 @ 2.2Ghz... Windows Vista Ultimate

What am I doing wrong... everyone else here with a T7500 has a time under 40 seconds. Is there some issue with macs?

 

there is not issue, you must set the treads to 2 (in Advanced Settings).

read the notes.

 

I already did that. I did read the notes.

 

If thats your time... then that means that you need to do some serious optimizing.

- disable all resource hogs (System Restore, Anti-Virus)
- switch appearance to Classic Mode
..etc...

 

New Time:

 

Woot. My c90 scored high

 

Why was it only running at 1600MHz? Did you make sure you were plugged in and on max performance settings?

 

It took that before i switched modes. It ran in its OC mode. My time is close to the e6700's which makes me happy.

 

With a just installed XP and some optimizing 42.921
On the stress/stability test it did not finish and a message "cheat detected" came up. ????

 

Hi, new to the forum. This one is from my new notebook dv6406nr.

CPU: AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core TK-53 @ 1.7GHz
RAM: 2GB DDR2
OS: Vista Home Premium (32 bit)
32M Speed test result: 45.918 sec

 

speed test 42.859sec
stability test 1367.531sec
I also got cheat detected on the stability test, the 2nd time I ran it. I forgot the score I got on my first stability test...

 

Speed 42.931 with minimal optomization
Stability tested at 1414.324 in normal configuration. Kinda low on this one?

 

Woot. 30.178 with firefox closed. Running vista x64 ultimate.
I'll run the stability test later. Im in the top 10. cpu is e6600, 2 gigs of ram.

 

I get the "unexpected error...quitting" problem. I am running Vista 64 on a T61.

I can't find a solution or workaround for this.

 

did you read the notes?

 

New score, cleaned fans:

 

New score,
HP dv8324 Intel Core 2 Duo 2.0Ghz, 2GB 533MHz RAM, 100GB 7200RPM HDD, 120GB 5200RPM HDD
256MB GeForce go 7600, 8X DVD+/-RW, bluetooth
http://img361.imageshack.us/img361/4278/scorekj1.jpg

Vista Ultimate 64bit

 

Clean install of vista ultimate x64. cpu e6600, 2 gigs of ram

 

WOOT!!!! i beat wu jen

CPU Found: CPU0
Name: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6700 @ 2.66GHz
Speed: 1000 MHz
L2 Cache: 4096 KB

best score 32M: 15.749 sec

ps: this is on a 900c , 4gig ram. Vista 64-bit. i would post pics but i dont know how to i have it saved though

 

Upload it to imageshack.us

 

You can also use the Add Attachment feature of the forums.

 

ok posted the pics i hope

 

Question: Why did this only pick up 1 cpu? and what about clock prob? New at this. Thanks for help

Welcome to wPrime Benchmark v1.53.
Stressing CPU to prevent false clock reading.
Scanning System - Please stand by.
rdtsc returned an invalid clock rate (0) - using system clock instead
CPU Found: CPU0
Name: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7300 @ 2.00GHz
Speed: 800 MHz
L2 Cache: 4096 KB

1 CPU(s) detected. Optimizing calculation.
CPUz isn't installed. Please install for more accurate hardware information.
Initiating thread structure, please stand by.
Type help for instructions.
Server set to: http://www.hwbot.org/submit.client.result.do?
>st 6
Calculating sqrts of first 33554431 numbers.
Thread 1 calculating from 0 to 33554431 in THREAD#17E4.
Thread 1 is 6% complete @ 13.953 seconds
Thread 1 is 13% complete @ 27.441 seconds
Thread 1 is 19% complete @ 41.226 seconds
Thread 1 is 25% complete @ 54.903 seconds
Thread 1 is 31% complete @ 68.937 seconds
Thread 1 is 38% complete @ 82.416 seconds
Thread 1 is 44% complete @ 96.074 seconds
Thread 1 is 50% complete @ 109.665 seconds
Thread 1 is 56% complete @ 123.449 seconds
Thread 1 is 63% complete @ 137.085 seconds
Thread 1 is 69% complete @ 150.806 seconds
Thread 1 is 75% complete @ 164.307 seconds
Thread 1 is 81% complete @ 178.218 seconds
Thread 1 is 88% complete @ 192.102 seconds
Thread 1 is 94% complete @ 205.556 seconds
Thread 1 complete with 0 errors!
Time taken: 219.133 seconds
Process completed in 219.158 seconds.
Test completed successfully.

 

remember to click on the "Install missing libraries"

if you are using XP, make sure that its Service Pack 2

if you are using Vista, make sure to click "Advanced Settings" and set threads to 2.

 

Ok did that and ran it, next question is what does this mean? Thread count set to 2
>st 6
Calculating sqrts of first 33554431 numbers.
Thread 1 calculating from 0 to 16777216 in THREAD#A90.
Thread 2 calculating from 16777216 to 33554431 in THREAD#1224.
Thread 1 is 12% complete @ 17.768 seconds
Thread 2 is 13% complete @ 20.945 seconds
Thread 1 is 25% complete @ 32.139 seconds
Thread 2 is 25% complete @ 43.883 seconds
Thread 1 is 38% complete @ 49.086 seconds
Thread 2 is 38% complete @ 61.796 seconds
Thread 1 is 50% complete @ 65.422 seconds
Thread 2 is 50% complete @ 79.632 seconds
Thread 1 is 62% complete @ 81.754 seconds
Thread 1 is 75% complete @ 96.822 seconds
Thread 2 is 63% complete @ 101.2 seconds
Thread 1 is 88% complete @ 112.001 seconds
Thread 2 is 75% complete @ 125.572 seconds
Thread 1 complete with 0 errors!
Time taken: 127.001 seconds
Thread 2 is 88% complete @ 140.428 seconds
Thread 2 complete with 0 errors!
Time taken: 154.139 seconds
Process completed in 154.154 seconds.
Test completed successfully.

The 2nd test would take forever at this rate. Confused, Yes I am.

 

What kind of system do you have?
- CPU, RAM
Which OS? 32bit or 64-bit?

 

XPS M1330 Notebook:
Intel Core 2 Duo Processor T7300
2GB,667MHZ,2X512
Hard Drive,120G,5.4 SATA
Liquid Crystal Display,Red,2M,Stand
128MB NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS
windows vista home premium 32 bit

 

If thats a 32M test, then you need to really optimize your OS to get the best possible score.

Get rid of the resources hogs:
- System Restore (useless usually)
- Switch Appearance back to "Classic Mode"
- Indexing of Drives (useless)
- Anti-Virus, Spyware/Malware detectors/agents...etc..