Measure your Notebook CPU Speed

Overclocked Core duo to 3.8ghz... Take a look at this! CRAZY! Calculated Super pi to 1M digits in a little over 15 seconds. That is possible with a -100*C cooling system. http://www.madshrimps.be/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=23453

This is a new record that beat the P4 overclocked to 7.2ghz.

 

1. IBM T43P
2,13 Ghz
2 Gb ram

1:34.

2. IBM T43P
2,13 Ghz
2 Gb ram

1:42

Strange they are exactly the same in every way except that the first one is not fully updated according to the IBM Software installer.

 

Laptop: Asus A6Jc with
- Intel Core Duo T2600(2.16GHz)
- 2GB 533MHz Ram
- 7200rpm PATA

AC: 1 min 8 sec
Battery: 1 min 9 sec

 

Desktop: 2.8GHz Intel P4/1GB DDR400 Kingston/256MB ATI 9800XT/Intel PERL MB = 1min 55s

Laptop: Dell XPS m1710/no mods/T2500 CPU/1GB 667MHz RAM/512MB 7900GTX/80GB 7200 SATA HD = coming after I clean some of the junk apps out.

 

Dell d620
Core duo t2500 2ghz
2gh 667 memory
40 gig hard drive 5400rpm

opps : )
1m 18s

 

mick2021,

You forgot to list your times...

 

Dell inspiron 8500:
Pentium 4m 2.5ghz
Seagate 40gb 5400rpm
Samsung 512mb @266mhz
Ati radeon 9000 (32mb)
-no tweaks-

Applz running:
firefox
norton
google notifier
super pi


plugged: 2m 39s
unplugged: 2m 40s

note: unplugged tested right after plugged

wow, only 1 sec diff. thanks to good old intel stepping =)

 

HP dv8000t (brand new, dual 2.0 intel, 2gigs ram, 2 80gb hd's.

1 minute 17 seconds.

 

I tested all settings upto 4M as you can see from the image. I tested at 16k + 32k but it took 0 secs so it registered as "not calculated" but it was tested.

Battery test was similar.

 

OK, did the XPS:

m1710/T2500 2GHz/1GB 667/80GB 7200/512 7900GTX/No Mods = 1m13s

 

On battery, with Rightmark utility set for Perfomance on Demand, while ripping a DVD on DVDFab Decrypter and Antivirus on:

1m12s

 

The core duo is so da** impressive! The T2500 is comparable to AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ > (even faster!)

I don't think Turion 64 x2 is going to be as good as core duo is.

Regards
Raptor

 

1 min 23 sec on battery

A8Jm: see sig

 

1m 54s plugged in with Firefox, Word, and AVG going

Dell Inspiron 9100
2.8ghz Prescott
512mb
60gb 7200rpm
Radeon 9700 128mb

 

Three-Year-Old Dell 5150 - 3.06 Ghz Mobile Pentium 4 - 512 mb RAM - 60 Gig 5,400 RPM Hard Drive...

2:10 plugged in
2:10 on battery (set to performance, as usual since I still get about 4 hours)

Why am I thinking of an upgrade again...?

~ Brett

P.S. - As I ran the test, the system properties only showed 1.59 GHz being used out of the reported 3.06. Anybody know what's up with that?

 

Power saving is usually the culprit.

few things to check out:
1. bios for the correct multiplier (doubt it in ur case)
2. power management scheme
3. check to see if the manufacturer (or intel) has a newer processor driver that allows the power management according to SYSTEM/PERFORMANCE requirement and NOT power/battery requirement.

cheers ...

 

MSI MS-1057
1.83 Ghz Core Duo T2400
1GB Mem DDR2/667
20GB HD

1m 23s

 

I recently acquired an early DELL CpiA300 in pristine condition. For amusement I upgraded to Windows XP and wireless LAN. It does everything you might need, provided that you don't mind waiting! I thought it would be fun to run Super PI and share the shocking result:

DELL CpiA300 : 300Mhz Pentium II, 256MB PC100, 60GB(4200rpm), 12.1" SVGA 24bit colour, NeoMagic256AV
14m 11s
14m 34s (Portable/Laptop scheme)
Can you beat this?

I also have a proper notebook.
SONY VGN-S3XP : 2.0Ghz Pentium M, 1GB PC2-4200, 80GB(5400rpm), 13.3" WXGA 32bit colour, 128M Go 6200
1m 34s
3m 16s (VAIO Maximum Battery power scheme)

I am looking forward to bootleg2go sharing his table of results.

 

Dell E1405

1.66Ghz Core Duo T2300E
1GB DDR2/533Mhz
60GB 5400rpm HD

1m 27s both plugged in and running on battery.

 

ASUS V6J
1min 26sec

 

1 min 18 seconds!

 

Celeron 1.5 MHz

2m 08 s

 

1m 16s

Core Duo T2400

Also running a considerable amount of processes and programs. **** this thing is fast.

 

My Travelmate 82oo got 1 22
a bit slow right?
I ran winamp and opera.
Something wrong i guess

 

Hp Nc6000 1.6g/512m/40g 2:14

 

My best result so far: 1:16. See the specs in my signature.

 

Hp NC6000 1.7g/2GB RAM/80G 1:59

 

Samsung R50
Pentium-m 740 (1.7Ghz, 533fsb, 2mb l2)
1gb ddr2 533mhz
60gb 5400 hdd

1m44s (on AC)

 

My desktop: XPS GEN 5 p4 3.2 4gig ram radeon x850xt pci express--1m32s
My laptop XPS M1710 2.16 2gig ram geForce 7800gtx 1m16s (AC) 2m0s (batt)

 

Core Duo T2600 2.16GHz
1GB DDR2-533 dual-channel

1m, 11s

 

Just because I'm bored, lol this will look funny with all the uber fast core duo times flying in this thread.

New super pi time for my Inspiron 6000 with ram upgraded from 1 to 2gigs

1.6ghz Pm (stock)
Original Super PI time on AC:
1:58

New time:
1:56

Doesn't seem like the extra gig helped me much.

My desktops time:AMD Athlon XP 2600+ 1.99GHz (Stock)
4:45 <--- I think I need to reformate this thing tomarrow. What has my family done to you?

 

MY DESKTOP:
768 ram, intel gfx, 1.8 ghz celeron, Gateway from 2001....

SUPER PI: 2Million Digits......... 8 minutes, 28 seconds

 

1:21 while connected to AC adapter.

Intel Duo Core 1.83 GHz
RAM 1 GB (about 600 MB were free)
HD 100 GB @ 5400 RPM

 

5:52 on AC. P3[900MHz] IBM Think Pad T22 I think I may have to upgrade. Little slow

 

Hey guys, first post!

6:26 on AC power I knew it'd be slow so I went to make a sandwich while it ran!

Toshiba Portege 4010, PIII-M 933MHz, 512mb ram, 16mb Trident Cyberblade Graphics, 30GB HDD.

Getting a new laptop soon that will hopefully post some less embarassing results!

 

1m 24sec on AC Power w/Programs Running
1m 17sec on AC Power wo/ Anything Running

 

Don't want to be a party pooper but pls remember SuperPI is not very accurate benchmark for CPU's. No way is a similar clocked core duo 70%+ faster than a pentium-m for single threaded applications. Its in the region of 10-30%... http://www.anandtech.com/showdoc.aspx?i=2663&p=7

 

Athlon Mobile 64 3500+

1:48

w/ all my programs running

 

My first measurement (with adapter plugged in)--was 2 minutes and 19 seconds. However, it might have been faster had I not been running FF and had WMP open (no music playing).
My second measurement (with adapter unplugged)--was 2 minutes and 32 seconds. (This time I had FF and WMP turned off).
PMZ
PS--Machine model, Processor and HD size are listed in my signature.

 

Acer 5672WLMi with bloatware and AC:
1:24

 

2:16 AC on with programs running
2:13 AC on no other program running
2:14 on batteries

biggest change was the raise in temperature from 40c on AC to 56 on batteries
on both times cpu use was only 50%

just run some other values of pi..

512k=13
1M=0:33
4M=2:53
8M=6:08 all on AC. The temperature rose to 69c on the last two..

 

1:33 plugged in.

 

amd athlon 64 x2 4400+ doing it in 1:33 ?
My core duo 1.66 does it in 1:26 ...

What does that mean?
My core duo cannot be faster than an amd athlon 64 x2 4400+

Regards
Raptor

 

5128TX:

No AC Power: 1:28 (No Programs Running)

 

Dell Latitude d620

2.16 duo core
2000mb
100gb 7200

2m = 1:10 doesnt depend on power

 

cel m 1.5 2:36 ram 60 gb ???rpm
intel P4 1:50 512 ram 125gb home built...

 

Tecra M5
T2500 2.0 Dual Core
1.5GiG 667MHz ddr2
100SATA5400

1M = 0:31
2M = 1:15

 

Lenovo 3000 N100

T2300 1.66GHz
512mb

Plugged in
1M = 36 sec
2M = 1 min 36 sec

Battery
1M = 57 sec
2M = 2 min 17 sec

will post again after memory upgrade

 

Toshiba Satellite A105
Core Solo 1.66Ghz.

2M

Plugged in - 1 min. 36 sec.

Battery- 1 min. 36 sec.

Is it supposed to be different if using only the battery?

 

asus w2jb

core duo t2500 @ 2.0ghz
1 gig ddr2 667mhz ram
100gb @ 5400rpm

super pi @ 2mil = 1:15 with ac power