Looking around the interwebs, I saw this: http://tech.yahoo.com/blog/null/26470. Normally, I use Yahoo! to read up on news and sports, but I decided to see how these "experts" can improve my knowledge. I've said it before and I'll say it again: I HATE PEOPLE.
A few excerpts:
To see this just breaks my heart. Now I've been here long enough that most of you know I hate fanboyishness, but this is ridiculous. I'd expect this from a noob, but from the Yahoo! "Experts" who have more credibility than anyone of us here. Just makes me want to shed a tear.
I know people don't like Vista, that it's a memory hog, that it requires a powerful computer. Apparently, Vista's so damn heavy that you need a dedicated card to run it too. Getting told by an expert that IE and Word will run much faster with a dedicated card. Another tear.
Remember, these guys are catering to the average joe, not us - crazy "I want the last frame, and I'll shoot my laptop to get it" type. Telling everyone that they need a Core 2 Duo and the latest GPU when a much cheaper option exists is horrible. Think how much money people waste by trusting these sources - ones that should be very accurate. I just wish we had more influence to be able to take on Yahoo!
-
I know what your saying, and agree the guy is wrong for all the reasons you say. With that said I guess I just accept it or I understand this guy is a journalist/tech guy not tech guy/journalist. My cousin was an editor and writer for PCMagizine for about 10 years. He was an English major in college not computer science. In other words he didn't really understand what he wrote about at a technical level to give thoughtful opinions, he was fed info by MFG's and spit it back out. At one time to the point of having to write a retraction. Don't want to say more if I do they could ID me and I don't want that. This guy is the same way I think. I think NBR has a lot of visibility on the WEB for those looking for answers, and once they get here they see the level of info and figure out who to listen to.
-
I agree.
In fact, I was just working with someone about making a budget rig, and to be honest, the AMD X2 lineup gives very good bang for the buck still and is more than adequate for many people's needs.
I feel you pain. -
they sound like the sales people at best buy
-
-
One thing I never understand is why best buy (or any of the other big box retailers) doesn't really offer any notebooks with discrete graphics options except for super high-end stuff. It's like the most common config on a mainstream notebook is: C2D 1.6-2.0GHz, 120 GB HDD, intel X3100, 1-2GB ram.
I wonder why more brick & mortar stores don't sell more medium-high end stuff? -
Also, most people who need a gaming/technical laptop know their stuff, and won't buy from a store like BestBuy. -
Never mind.
-
-
Wow that's a terrible article.
Also just read this part:
-
No snide comments please :laugh: -
I guess thats why most of us will not be hired as Best Buy sales reps. Because of a customer comes by and asks about a laptop, we will know which of the lower priced laptops would suit their needs, and BB will not sell any of the overpriced higher end laptops.
-
-
-
Don't worry about the article's effect on readers. Just read all of the negative feedback he received in the comments section!
-
I second the AMD X2 comment. It DOES provide a very good bang for the buck processor for a budget system. Even for a laptop, Turions run slightly cheaper than the Intels. Just goes to show, go to a real place for tech advice.
-
ToxicBanana Notebook Consultant NBR Reviewer
-
This guy doesn't know what the hell he's talking about and he writes like crap. They should sack him and replace him with someone that can write, at least
Misinformation: It Pains Me
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by Lithus, Oct 10, 2007.