The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Not much performance difference when upgrading from..

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by kisetsu17, Jul 21, 2009.

  1. kisetsu17

    kisetsu17 Took me long enough

    Reputations:
    289
    Messages:
    780
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    31
    ...a C2D T5800 to either a T9600 or a T9800, right? So it's fine if the price difference is $250 for a T9600 and $310 for a T9800, right? My seller told me his last T9800 was defective, and he offered me a T9600 or T9550 (I'd say go for the T9600, but I still asked him if he'd give me a discount on his T9900 lol wants it sold at $410).

    I was also thinking about cutting waiting time from waiting for the warranty to expire to just right after my lappy gets fixed (busted half-LCD screen), so yeah..

    Also, how much would you be willing to have the T9900? 410 bucks seems too much for me..
     
  2. sgogeta4

    sgogeta4 Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,389
    Messages:
    10,552
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    456
    Why do you even need a faster processor? If you currently utilize your CPU at 100% load often, then you will notice a significant difference, otherwise the difference for most common tasks won't be that much.
     
  3. kisetsu17

    kisetsu17 Took me long enough

    Reputations:
    289
    Messages:
    780
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I hit the 100% often, since I do moderate to heavy gaming, video post-production and Photoshop work.
     
  4. sgogeta4

    sgogeta4 Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,389
    Messages:
    10,552
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    456
    Go for the T9600 then, $100 more isn't worth the bump to the T9900 IMO.
     
  5. LisuPoland

    LisuPoland Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    150
    Messages:
    830
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Hm I have the T5800 CPU and I was wondering the same - does it pay-off to upgrade the CPU if I do heavy gaming - Call of Duty : World at War mostly
    I was thinking about the P8600 2,4 GHz CPU - anyone who could give a correct hint?
     
  6. Han Bao Quan

    Han Bao Quan The Assassin

    Reputations:
    4,071
    Messages:
    4,208
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    I would worry more about the GPu if I were you. T5800 is more than enough for COD WAW. But you want more power, it's up to you. P8600 is an excellent choice.
     
  7. LisuPoland

    LisuPoland Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    150
    Messages:
    830
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Why would you worry about the GPU?
    Currently I can run every game on the market - I even get good results with Resident Evil 5 benchmark with high settings in native res - 20 to 25 fps but still....very playable and smooth looking :)
     
  8. sgogeta4

    sgogeta4 Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,389
    Messages:
    10,552
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    456
    Because your GPU is your limiting factor. If you could upgrade your GPU, it would yield more of a performance boost than the CPU. Your current CPU is fast enough to run those games.
     
  9. yuio

    yuio NBR Assistive Tec. Tec.

    Reputations:
    634
    Messages:
    3,637
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    the upgrade from a T5800 to a T9600 is quite a bit when it comes to photoshop and video rendering I would strongly recomend the upgrade.
     
  10. Phil

    Phil Retired

    Reputations:
    4,415
    Messages:
    17,036
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    455
    If you monitor your CPU use during gaming you won't have to rely on other people's answers. If you're not going over 90% there's no point in upgrading.
     
  11. LisuPoland

    LisuPoland Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    150
    Messages:
    830
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    31
    thx guys, I won't upgrade from T5800 then :)
    When DX 11 generation GPU's become standard I migh get myself a good ol' fashioned PC with HD 5890x2 card :D and nice Quad CPU to boost the flavour :D
     
  12. bassflow

    bassflow Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    7
    Messages:
    343
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Just wondering, but how do you monitor the CPU usage? Also how would you do it during games?
     
  13. kisetsu17

    kisetsu17 Took me long enough

    Reputations:
    289
    Messages:
    780
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Well this is my primary use for the laptop, maaan post-production could be a pain in the butt with this T5800, even making large-scale tarp designs take time for me (thought all I needed was >4GB RAM there) so yeah, thanks, also to the other dudes that shared. :cool:

    I'm pretty much convinced that RMClock lets you know how exactly is your CPU utilized (have mine undervolted, so RMClock runs 24/7 on my system tray, with the gear-like CPU Meter down there). I'd use the CPU Meter provided by Windows Vista, though I think it adds to the actual CPU usage more than RMClock.

    While gaming, however, I'd use RivaTuner statistics server. I mean, you won't see it while gaming, but you could keep track of it afterwards with its graph-like thingy, so yeah.