The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Processor 800mhz and 667mhz FSB, different?

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by Significa, Jul 12, 2007.

  1. Significa

    Significa Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    14
    Messages:
    218
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Is there any significant loses from this?

    Basically I have to go with the 667mhz FSB to get 2GB ram and a bigger HD, wondering if performance will go down or anything.
     
  2. baddogboxer

    baddogboxer Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    144
    Messages:
    1,092
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    More info, maybe link.
     
  3. wave

    wave Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    813
    Messages:
    2,563
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    If you use 667mhz Ram the CPU FSB will still be 800mhz (if you are useing Santa Rosa). The ram speed does not effect the FSB. 667mhz Ram is the maximum Santa Rosa can use, it does not support 800mhz ram. So unless you are getting a laptop based on a desktop chipset 667mhz is the fastest you can use.
     
  4. Significa

    Significa Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    14
    Messages:
    218
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I'll be using 667mhz RAM. I'm wondering if there is a noticeable difference and battery life (Supposely Santa Rosa imporves battery life?) between an 800mhz FSB CPU and a 667mhz FSB CPU when using the 667mhz RAM.
     
  5. coolguy

    coolguy Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    805
    Messages:
    4,679
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Significa is talking about the FSB, (667 MHz vs 800 MHz) not the RAM.
     
  6. coolguy

    coolguy Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    805
    Messages:
    4,679
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    106
    It's obvious that 800 MHz FSB will be faster than 667 MHz.
     
  7. Significa

    Significa Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    14
    Messages:
    218
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Yes it is obvious that it will be faster but will the performance and battery life be noticeable?
     
  8. baddogboxer

    baddogboxer Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    144
    Messages:
    1,092
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I don't trust what is said want specs you guys are talking apples and oranges!
     
  9. adinu

    adinu I pwn teh n00bs.

    Reputations:
    489
    Messages:
    2,842
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    No it's not gonna be noticeable, unless you're a machine (which I hope you're not).

    133MHz of bus will not be noticed by a human in windows, or anything else that he/she might do with a computer. Maybe a benchmark might have different numbers, but unless you really care about that then don't worry about the FSB.

    I gurantee you that if you take 1000 people and give them 2 identical notebooks but one with 667 bus and one with 800 bus, that NOT ONE person will be able to tell you which is the 800 bus computer and which is the 667 bus one.
     
  10. Significa

    Significa Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    14
    Messages:
    218
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Alright thanks adinu.
     
  11. mx7

    mx7 Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    LOL :D


    -