The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Question about Intel SU9400 performance?

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by ScyKic, Nov 14, 2008.

  1. ScyKic

    ScyKic Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I currently have an old "Yonah" T2500 2.0ghz, 667fsb.
    I'm thinking about buying a new Toshiba R600 with the new "Penryn" SU9400 1.4ghz, 800fsb chip.

    I'm wondering how do the 2 chips compare?

    I know one is faster clocked and a full voltage chip. But I'm thinking maybe with the much new chipset and slightly quicker FSB, the performance won't be too different.

    I'm especially interested in how the SU9400 performs in more processor heavy situations.

    Thank you in advance for your opinions and experience.
     
  2. sgogeta4

    sgogeta4 Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,389
    Messages:
    10,552
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    456
    SU9400 isn't really meant for heavy processor usage. It's pretty slow imo, but compared to an old Yonah (single core?) it would probably be equal or slightly slower.
     
  3. ScyKic

    ScyKic Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    The Yonah is dual core 2ghz.
    If it is equal, I'm ok with it since the Yonah is good enough for everything at the moment.
    But slower would be a problem.

    Does anyone have any experience with these ultra low voltage chips?
    And maybe Wprime or Super pi scores?
    Thanks