So which of these are better if you could get them at the same price? If i remember the new ones have aFRAC and that makes it not 8bit but 6bit screen. Is it noticeable? Also i thought the older monitors has a little better...err less back light bleed and better distribution but i can't remember off the top of my head and i honestly don't have time to re read the 20 page review for each at tncentral so i was hoping someone here might know the answer. I am also asking because there is a good deal on the Dell monitors. I posted it in the deals section so check it out.
zr24w vs zr2440w
u2410m vs u2412m
Thanks as always!!!
HF
EDIT: also if the older models are better how much more would you consider is worth paying for them? +$XX amount
-
HopelesslyFaithful Notebook Virtuoso
-
HopelesslyFaithful Notebook Virtuoso
ah the 2410 is 10 bit afrac. Any ways thanks
-
superparamagnetic Notebook Consultant
CCFL lighting can also mean a wider color gamut. For example the U2410 can do aRGB, whereas the U2412m can only do sRGB.
Between the Dells, the U2410 is more of a professional monitor, while the U2412m is more of a prosumer monitor. -
I agree with you that few old computers are better .And between zr24w vs zr2240w i go with zr2240w
and between u2410m vs u2412m i recommend you a u2410m.I don't know about the paying price for them.
Question on which of these monitors are better. Does aFRAC really matter?
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by HopelesslyFaithful, Apr 9, 2013.