The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Questions About SDD For New Sager

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by meyer0095, Apr 6, 2011.

  1. meyer0095

    meyer0095 Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    70
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Hi,
    I am buying a Sager NP8150 from XoticPC. Right now I am most likely getting it with a 120GB Intel 510 Series Solid State Drive (SSD2 Serial-ATA III).

    I do everything from heavy gaming, to photoshop, to web browsing, to school work, and a bit of programming here and there, maybe more if I major in CS in college. Basically, I do plenty of multitasking and have heard an SSD is extremely worth it for my usage.

    A few questions:

    - Should I buy my SSD aftermarket, or is it fine just buying installed in my Sager?
    - I have heard that the life of an SSD is relatively short (2-3 years) because it is flash memory. I have also heard that issue has been fixed, and SSDs now have the same life span as a regular HDD. Which is true?
    - Should I go with the Intel 510? I am looking for about a 120gig. 160gig would be even nicer. Looking for a good brand, good reliability. Ideally, the fastest/best on the market that isn't a crazy price compared to the rest. Xotic only offers the 510, so I would have to buy aftermarket if I switch to something else.


    Thank you very much
     
  2. meyer0095

    meyer0095 Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    70
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I do everything from heavy gaming, to photo editing, to schoolwork. I am looking for an overall reliable and fast (A good balance between the two) SSD.

    I am buying a NP8150 which is what the SDD will be for. I was originally going with the 120gig Intel 510, but is it worth waiting for the Crucial C400 or maybe just go with the Crucial C300?

    I think I am just going to get a basic HD with my laptop, put it an enclosure and make it an external. I will probably just end up waiting till the laptop is close to coming to make the purchase from NewEgg, but I have some time.

    For my uses, which would you guys recommend?
     
  3. HTWingNut

    HTWingNut Potato

    Reputations:
    21,580
    Messages:
    35,370
    Likes Received:
    9,877
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Crucial C300 and C400 are supposed to be good with heavy multitasking. But Intel X25-M 160GB is a good contender as well. Should be cheaper and still hot performance overall.

    Personally, I'm not liking what I see in the new Intel's for the price at least. If you go Intel best bang for the buck at the moment is the X25-M 120GB.
     
  4. Thisisalamp

    Thisisalamp Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    256
    Messages:
    758
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    An aftermarket is usually cheaper than a pre-installed SSD. It's quite easy to install the SSD on a NP8150. I can suggest you not to consider the Corsair Force series; had connector problems with my NP8150. Am getting a C300 myself, and had quite positive feedback.
     
  5. hizzaah

    hizzaah Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,672
    Messages:
    2,418
    Likes Received:
    289
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Once you get into the ssd's, the actual performance difference you're going to see will probably very minimal. Especially if this will be your first ssd
     
  6. tilleroftheearth

    tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...

    Reputations:
    5,398
    Messages:
    12,692
    Likes Received:
    2,717
    Trophy Points:
    631

    Not true at all.

    The new Vertex 3 120GB models are pretty shabby (even Anand doesn't recommend them).

    The Intel 510 being offered is the one I would consider (but definitely only the 250GB model). How much is the 'upgrade' to this SSD from Sager? If it is less than ~$600, then I would buy it from them.
     
  7. meyer0095

    meyer0095 Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    70
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    The 120gig is $255 upgrade from a 500gig 7200rpm. On NewEgg it is like ~$270. Might as well buy it aftermarket and get a a 500gig for only $25.
     
  8. tilleroftheearth

    tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...

    Reputations:
    5,398
    Messages:
    12,692
    Likes Received:
    2,717
    Trophy Points:
    631
    Like I mentioned, I would only consider the 250GB model - however, if the price is similar for the bigger version, I would still order it from Sager.

    Having a complete system from a single vendor is worth losing a $25, 500GB HDD 'deal', if/when you need an issue solved in the future.

    Consider it 'compatibility' insurance. :)
     
  9. Phil

    Phil Retired

    Reputations:
    4,415
    Messages:
    17,036
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    455
    Agreed. Real life performance differences are hard to notice.

    He doesn't recommend it is because the 120GB is slower than the 240GB just like the Intel 510 120GB is slower than the 250GB.

    Slower meaning it's slower in Anand's simulated work load benchmarks. Differences in real life during normal notebook usage are a completely different story.
     
  10. tilleroftheearth

    tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...

    Reputations:
    5,398
    Messages:
    12,692
    Likes Received:
    2,717
    Trophy Points:
    631
    Phil,

    Link to back up your 'completely different story' claim?

    He doesn't recommend them because they perform worse than his 'next generation performance threshold'. He also doesn't claim to know how much of a hit different controllers have with smaller capacity drives.

    Anand:
    Anand:
    See:
    The OCZ Vertex 3 Review (120GB) - AnandTech :: Your Source for Hardware Analysis and News
     
  11. Phil

    Phil Retired

    Reputations:
    4,415
    Messages:
    17,036
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    455
    I disagree with Anand, I would not recommend any Sandforce drive (even 240GB) for people that work a lot with compressible data.

    About the 'completely different story', it comes from reading a lot of reviews that compare smaller versions of SSDs like X25m (80GB vs. 160GB) and C300 (128GB vs. 256GB) with their larger brothers. I don't have links at hand. Meaningful differences show up in file copies and simulated workload benchmarks (which rely rather heavily on multi tasking).

    Just because Anand's Storagebench shows a big difference between the 120GB and 240GB doesn't mean that the difference will be there in real world notebook usage.
     
  12. Judicator

    Judicator Judged and found wanting.

    Reputations:
    1,098
    Messages:
    2,594
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Did you mean "incompressible" data?
     
  13. Phil

    Phil Retired

    Reputations:
    4,415
    Messages:
    17,036
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    455
    Yes I meant incompressible.

    On a sidenote, applications and Windows are very well compressible. So it would have to be very large volumes of incompressible data.
     
  14. hizzaah

    hizzaah Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,672
    Messages:
    2,418
    Likes Received:
    289
    Trophy Points:
    101
    why's it always Phil and tillerofthearth that argue about ssd stuff? lol. every thread i've taken the time to read on here have you two commenting against each other..

    either way, the OP obviously has a budget/size in mind so the 120-128gb ones are what he's looking at. based on those sizes, i dont think you can go wrong with any of the options you've listed. tiller posted a good comment about the fact that if you buy it through xotic, it'll be covered under the system. maybe it'll be easier/quicker for you to get a replacement if something goes wrong

    if you decide you dont like the ssd options that xotic provides and you want it covered through your reseller, maybe look at mythlogic. they have many more ssd options, and if they dont have one you want, they'll get it so it'll be covered
     
  15. Phil

    Phil Retired

    Reputations:
    4,415
    Messages:
    17,036
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    455
    On the other hand, an Intel OEM SSD bought through a system builder may only have one year warranty. If you buy through Amazon or Newegg I believe you get three years warranty.
     
  16. hizzaah

    hizzaah Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,672
    Messages:
    2,418
    Likes Received:
    289
    Trophy Points:
    101
    it should still be covered under the length of your parts warranty. for instance i have 2 year parts, 4 years labor.. i'll probably extend the parts coverage another year at a later date, and labor is useless to me honestly, i'd rather just do it myself. but all the parts they put in should be covered for 2 years under their warranty
     
  17. Mr_Mysterious

    Mr_Mysterious Like...duuuuuude

    Reputations:
    1,552
    Messages:
    2,383
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    56
    I would like to know more about this as well please :)

    I'm seriously considering the 128GB C300 for my boot drive...but I'm waiting a couple of months to see whether or not the new SSDs are worth the wait. In either case, I need a decent SATA3 SSD that is not too far behind the times (future-proofing; I know, it's pointless, but I don't want to walk around with outdated hardware).

    Mr. Mysterious