The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Questions Undervolting i7 6700HQ

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by DaReference5754, Aug 19, 2016.

  1. DaReference5754

    DaReference5754 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    21
    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    16
    I am starting to undervolt my CPU with Throttlestop.
    At the same time I am monitoring with HWinfo64.

    When I make offset -100mV and start prime95 for stresstest, then HWInfo showing me for each core 1,08-1,09V. Before offset it was ~1,11V on each core @3,1GHZ during prime95.

    So it is just -20mV during 100% load, why no -100mV like I did in Throttlestop?
    Is it reading error?

    2nd question: Why is Volt higher on cores while there is no load at all?
    when I start prime95 the Volt goes down on each core?
     
  2. Mobius 1

    Mobius 1 Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    3,447
    Messages:
    9,069
    Likes Received:
    6,376
    Trophy Points:
    681
    Don't use prime95, use OCCT large data set with infinite mode.

    Core voltage variances are normal, it's ok to see one core requesting a different amount of voltage compared to the other.

    Try undervolting with stress test OCCT, I'd say -35mv on core and cache, then work your way down.

    Stress test should be run at least for 8-10 hour for checking, 24 hour if you're confident enough.
     
    TomJGX likes this.
  3. DaReference5754

    DaReference5754 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    21
    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    16
    ty for reply. But my question was, why do the cores only take 20mV less, when my offset is -100mV.
    Is this the normal case?
    I will try OCCT, thank you !
     
  4. TomJGX

    TomJGX I HATE BGA!

    Reputations:
    1,456
    Messages:
    8,707
    Likes Received:
    3,315
    Trophy Points:
    431
    I stress test with XTU Stress test for 5 mins and its always enough for me :)
     
  5. Mobius 1

    Mobius 1 Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    3,447
    Messages:
    9,069
    Likes Received:
    6,376
    Trophy Points:
    681

    I'd always test for at least 10h OCCT, short benchmarks like that don't demonstrate proper usage scenario
     
  6. DackEW

    DackEW Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    47
    Messages:
    178
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Such a time and energy waisting, who has time and patient to do that?

    I used to run 10 minutes stress max, passed it with -180mv, so I decided to go with -145mv. This -145mv is also very decent, stable and never had any issue for two months now.
     
    TomJGX likes this.
  7. Mobius 1

    Mobius 1 Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    3,447
    Messages:
    9,069
    Likes Received:
    6,376
    Trophy Points:
    681

    [​IMG]
     
  8. TomJGX

    TomJGX I HATE BGA!

    Reputations:
    1,456
    Messages:
    8,707
    Likes Received:
    3,315
    Trophy Points:
    431
    My man there :)

    Exactly my thoughts :)
     
    DackEW likes this.
  9. kisetsu17

    kisetsu17 Took me long enough

    Reputations:
    289
    Messages:
    780
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    31
    My .02:

    I use Intel XTU and I have it set at -175.xxx mV (I think it's mV anyway). I remember only encountering problems beyond -190, so overall I'm happy with it. Slashed around 2-3C from my stress tests. Never ran any tests longer than a few hours.