Looking at ThinkPad T60. Mostly used for routine text-oriented tasks and travel, but also used at home (on AC) for editing digital photos. No gaming to speak of.
Is there an incremental value to the Radeon GPU (vs Intel 950)?
Will it decrease battery life?
Thanks in advance!
Saul
-
It'll probably consume a little more power than the 950; if you're not gaming at all, then there's really no point in getting the x1300.
-
I agree with Flanken
-
Thank you!
S -
Not even for playing DVDs?
-
GPU is needed for gaming, 3D animation, CAD/CAM, [strike-thru]and to some extent Photoshop where you may be manipulating large images in memory, but I'm not even positive about the last item.[/strike-thru] -
I think with Photoshop its the same concept with DVD's as its also a 2D image (unless doing 3D modeling with PS). PS is more memory intesnive.
-
I'm finally getting it (duh!): the discrete GPU is just useful for 3D rendering!
Is that the whole of it?
S -
Examples - running a bunch of frames at DVD resolution is fairly simple nowadays.
Loading say a 15,000 x 30,000 pixel image might take a minute or two on the Intel 950 and 20 seconds on the X1300, but the image is still there correctly after it loads.
Drawing the screen for a 3D game is a problem, b/c if you have to wait for the images to develop, you are out of sync in the game. -
-
http://www.ati.com/technology/avivo/index.html
http://www.nvidia.com/page/purevideo.html
Radeon x1300 - need for, effect on battery life?
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by Shiffman, Jul 7, 2006.