The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Rumor: new intel 6Gbps SSD in March

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by gmoneyphatstyle, Feb 17, 2011.

  1. gmoneyphatstyle

    gmoneyphatstyle Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    399
    Messages:
    733
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    If you are thinking of buying an intel SSD, you might want to wait a month.
    Hopefully prices on current models will fall.

    I've posted this in other threads already, but since new intel SSDs don't come along often, thought I better post it for all to see here.

    PC Perspective - Intel 510 series of SATA 6G SSD coming March 1st?

     
  2. James D

    James D Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    2,314
    Messages:
    4,901
    Likes Received:
    1,132
    Trophy Points:
    231
    too little speeds, isn't it? I guess vertex 2 has 40000
     
  3. davepermen

    davepermen Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,972
    Messages:
    7,788
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    as far as i know, the way intel delivers the numbers might be smaller, the performance though will be better.
     
  4. kent1146

    kent1146 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    2,354
    Messages:
    4,449
    Likes Received:
    476
    Trophy Points:
    151
    The one weakness of IOPS is that there isn't a standard way of measuring IOPS.

    Measuring IOPS depends on:
    • What kind of usage pattern is being used? 4KB Reads? 4K-64K reads?
    • What program(s) are you using to run the test? IOMeter? AS SSD?
    • Are you quoting theoretical limits of the controller, or actual test results that were observed in a benchmark/

    Because of that, it's hard to just take a look at an IOPS number and compare it to another IOPS number for another drive, unless you absolutely know you're doing an apples-to-apples comparison.

    Confusing, yes. I wish there was a better way to standardize this.
     
  5. FXi

    FXi Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    345
    Messages:
    1,054
    Likes Received:
    130
    Trophy Points:
    81
    Better off just looking at real world test scripts that can be reproduced across drives.

    I'm just looking forward to 320gb from Intel. That'll be a reasonable maker and size to make the leap to SSD
     
  6. MaX PL

    MaX PL Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    104
    Messages:
    1,042
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    56
    it says compatible with intel 6 series chipsets.

    is it also backwards compatible with series 4 mobile chipsets like on my t400?
     
  7. kent1146

    kent1146 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    2,354
    Messages:
    4,449
    Likes Received:
    476
    Trophy Points:
    151
    It is compatible, yes. It will run at SATA2 (3Gbps) speeds, and not full SATA3 (6Gbps) speeds, but it will work.
     
  8. Tsunade_Hime

    Tsunade_Hime such bacon. wow

    Reputations:
    5,413
    Messages:
    10,711
    Likes Received:
    1,204
    Trophy Points:
    581
    I hope Intel doesn't delay the March 11th launch of the G3 SSDs...
     
  9. sgogeta4

    sgogeta4 Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,389
    Messages:
    10,552
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    456
    These aren't the G3s. These are still using the G2 controller (albeit tweaked and with SATA/600 support) and 34nm memory.
     
  10. James D

    James D Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    2,314
    Messages:
    4,901
    Likes Received:
    1,132
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Rumors say that these are coming 1-st March. But G3 perhaps will go 11-th
     
  11. chimpanzee

    chimpanzee Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    683
    Messages:
    2,561
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    How can they almost double/triple the sequential read/write using the same controller ?
     
  12. Marecki_clf

    Marecki_clf Homo laptopicus

    Reputations:
    464
    Messages:
    1,507
    Likes Received:
    170
    Trophy Points:
    81
    I think You should address Intel wit this question :).

    My guess would be increasing the amount of cache, optimizing firmware. I would say that the controller will be different.
     
  13. chimpanzee

    chimpanzee Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    683
    Messages:
    2,561
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    That is why I ask the question. It is unlikely to be the same controller as G2. No cache can do that kind of improvement.
     
  14. sgogeta4

    sgogeta4 Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,389
    Messages:
    10,552
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    456
    I guess we'll see in the reviews. All I remember from what I've read is that they are based on the G2s and not the G3s.
     
  15. Judicator

    Judicator Judged and found wanting.

    Reputations:
    1,098
    Messages:
    2,594
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Are you sure you're not confusing things with the 310 mPCI-E SSDs (which are basically the G2s in a new form factor)? I admit I haven't paid much attention to the 510s, but I was under the impression that they were 34 nm NAND flash with a new controller (that was SATA III (6 Gbps) capable).
     
  16. chenavd

    chenavd Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    71
    Messages:
    39
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
  17. sgogeta4

    sgogeta4 Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,389
    Messages:
    10,552
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    456
    The new G3's are supposed to end in 20, while the G2 based drives end in 10. The new G3 drives are only SATA/300 and will utilize the new 25nm NAND. I believe the information is posted a few times in this forum.
     
  18. Judicator

    Judicator Judged and found wanting.

    Reputations:
    1,098
    Messages:
    2,594
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Oh, yes, I know that. I meant more on the level of "based on", since I didn't think the 510s were "based on" the G2s so much. I'd argue that the ending in 10 is more likely to mean based on 34 nm NAND rather than based on the G2.