The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    SATA3 replaced in 2014

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by Cloudfire, Jan 5, 2013.

  1. Cloudfire

    Cloudfire (Really odd person)

    Reputations:
    7,279
    Messages:
    10,304
    Likes Received:
    2,878
    Trophy Points:
    581
    2014. That is when we will remove the monkey thats been dragging along on our backs. By that I mean we will have a new faster standard:
    SATA Express

    Meaning we will go from 0.6GB/s per lane (SATA3) to 1.0GB/s (SATA Express) and all the way up to 2GB/s (SATA Express)
    Already today we have SSDs that reach 550MB/s, so a new standard is highly appriciated. :)

    [​IMG]

    PCI Express-Based Serial ATA Specification Close to Ratification - X-bit labs
    New Superfast SATA Express Standard Brings 8 & 16GB/s Data Transfer Speeds to Storage Devices - Legit Reviews
    http://www.sata-io.org/documents/SATA_Express_Infographic_Final.pdf
    http://www.sata-io.org/technology/sataexpress.asp
     
  2. tilleroftheearth

    tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...

    Reputations:
    5,398
    Messages:
    12,692
    Likes Received:
    2,717
    Trophy Points:
    631
    Whoa, 2014 huh? Better start saving now. It's going to be an expensive year upgrading all the toys... uhm, I mean workstations around here.

    While the jump is less than 100% faster initially - what it should do is take away a lot of the latency that SATA3 has right now in overhead. That is what I'm waiting to experience. Along with hopefully then-current SSD's that take advantage of this progress and give us capacities worth spending real $$$ on (1TB minimum, for example).

    And just for clarity - I don't want the 'fake' SATA Express version - I want the SFF-8639 'real' implementation on all available devices whether they are notebooks, tablets or desktops.
     
  3. ramgen

    ramgen -- Morgan Stanley --

    Reputations:
    513
    Messages:
    1,322
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    55
    This is actually late.
    SSDs with RAID-0 setup started to bottleneck SATA interface. Better to move on to SATA IV or something else...


    --
     
  4. Cloudfire

    Cloudfire (Really odd person)

    Reputations:
    7,279
    Messages:
    10,304
    Likes Received:
    2,878
    Trophy Points:
    581
    Raid0 with SATA Express is gonna be 2GB/s. With the SFF-8639 which tiller talks about is gonna support 4GB/s on Raid0. No way in hell we are gonna saturate that for quite some time :D
    Like Anandtech says: " It took SandForce all of one year to release a controller that could saturate a 6Gbps SATA interface"
    So who knows, the OEMs are probably just dying for a new standard and is ready to unleash drives that will use all this speed within a year? If so it sounds pretty promising for the future :)
    But yeah I agree, it took quite a while from the planning board to the final spec. Way too much time

    Intel is pretty soon out with their 530 SSD that is ready for SATA Express btw. Not shure if they have some secret tricks inside their sleeves or if its just jumping on a standard thats future proof
    http://forum.notebookreview.com/solid-state-drives-ssds-flash-storage/702649-brand-new-intel-520-180gb-ssd-looks-like-its-used-2.html#post9020557
     
  5. sgogeta4

    sgogeta4 Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,389
    Messages:
    10,552
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    456
    While sequential speeds are impressive for marketing, in terms of users, it will be hardly noticeable. Random speeds are significantly more important and they are just barely saturating SATA/150. While I'm all for increasing bus speed and decreasing overhead, marketing these super fast sequential speeds doesn't really help the end user.
     
  6. ZaZ

    ZaZ Super Model Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    4,982
    Messages:
    34,001
    Likes Received:
    1,415
    Trophy Points:
    581
    I would agree. Typical notebook/PC usage doesn't put much of a load on the controller, which makes the extra bandwidth a non-factor for most uses.