I tried searching for more information on these two SE-SSDs but failed to find relevant information. Therefore, I chose to create this thread.
I'm currently considering one of these two enterprise/OEM level SE-SSDs and I'm leaning more towards the SanDisk X300s for the following reasons. 1.) the included WAVE SELF-ENCRYPTING DRIVE MANAGEMENT software, 2.) I'd prefer a cooler running SE-SSD, 3.) I really like how the SanDisk Extreme Pro performs but it lacks self-encryption.
I currently own 4 Micron M510 128GB M.2 SSDs (non-SE) that normally operate at 55 degrees Celsius, even at idle. For comparison, my Samsung 470 128GB and 830 256GB SSDs normally operate around 35 degrees Celsius which is a huge difference. At one point I owned and sold my Crucial M500 960GB which also operated around 55 degrees Celsius. I'm starting to think most Micron/Crucial SSDs operating at or around 55 degrees Celsius, even during idle, is normal. Even if it is "normal," its too hot for my liking. I'd like to see how hot Micron/Crucial SSDs get when they're pushed to their limit (I've yet to test this, I'll have to figure out a way to test it).
At a minimum I am after an enterprise/OEM level, 2.5" SATA form factor, 256GB capacity and 25-30% OP. I had also considered a consumer level Crucial MX200 but settled on enterprise/OEM level due to stricter validation processes usually required by said enterprises and OEMs.
I have already read Anandtech's Micron M600 Review and SanDisk X300s Review to help me reach a decision but would appreciate some input.
Which psuedo SLC cache solution is considered best? Micron's Dynamic Write Acceleration or SanDisk's nCache?
The Micron M600 is capable of using Momentum Cache via Storage Executive like my M510 does (I really like MC). So, does SanDisk provide a similar RAM caching solution in its SSD Dashboard?
Who provides the best overall software and hardware experience?
-
davidricardo86 Notebook Deity
-
tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...
The self encrypting features must be very, very important to you?
Why not just add the software you're looking at to the SanDisk Extreme Pro that you are already considering for performance reasons? Is that even possible?
I agree 100% with you on the temperatures; 55C at idle is too hot and an indication of bad design (purposely or not...) and/or wrong implementation of the tech used... Not only will such designs throttle the storage subsystem prematurely, but they may contribute to throttling the rest of the platform too (cpu/gpu/memory/chipsets) if that excess heat isn't addressed and vented properly.
Btw; the link you provide to the Wave software has already failed my internal test; it is managed by the cloud and cloud=no security in any sense of the word.
Even with a fully compliant SE drive (with or without cloud management functions), when connected online; the security is comprised at that point and each and every time thereafter. If security/privacy is truly important - do not record it on any medium (even with paper and pen).
Momentum Cache is available for Crucial/Micron drives (make sure you download and use the correct version for the drive(s) you have) and I highly recommend it too. But at this point, SanDisk does not make a comparable offering.
As far as pseudo SLC? Unless your workloads are ALL bursty type scenarios, it is just a gimmick to put higher numbers on the retail boxes... especially for TLC 'junk' ssd's.
See:
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/adata-sp550-ssd,4296.html
To me; pseudo SLC is an indication of a fundamental design problem in some currently offered SSD's- not a benefit in any way, shape or form.
Hope the above helps a little (and hope someone comes in with a direct response to your SE related inquiries). -
Use case?
All Micron drives are hot at idle. The idle power draw is relatively high as well.
-
-
OP, I have the 128GB, 256GB, and 512GB M600s and they are FINE drives, really. It's my preferred drive for balance of features, price, performance, and reliability, and Momentum Cache actually WORKS, unlike RAPID bs.davidricardo86 and hmscott like this. -
tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...
Except that in this case, the cloud is what is used to configure your settings... uh, duh... (not you, the SE software).
Which means that you've already been compromised, you just don't know when... -
-
tilleroftheearth likes this.
-
tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...
While your R1 is a good sized platform and with better cooling than most notebooks, that is still a nice temp to see.
If I had to guess, the smaller nand needs higher voltage and therefore higher temps to 'drive' properly, so what must have changed is something inherent in the firmware of these models.
-
davidricardo86 Notebook Deity
2.) The SanDisk Extreme Pro lacks hardware self encryption. However, paid or free software solutions are available such as Microsoft's BitLocker Drive Encryption which can be added to non-SE SSDs. As you may already know, software based encryption adds a bit of overhead to the host PC which results in a hit in performance. Therefore, I want to dabble with hardware based encryption first and that requires an SE-SSD. Both solutions have pros and cons, as most cases its a matter of picking the right tool for the job.
3.) It can be managed locally too. While I appreciate the security concern recommendation, I'm not about to start memorizing all of my "top secret" data. That's not being realistic so I'll just take the risk. Shoot, up to this point I wasn't even the slightest concerned about storing my data on non-SE HDDs so I think I'll accept being a guinea pig and go forward with my little experiment.
Anandtech SanDisk X300s Review
5.) So does having pseudo SLC even hurt anything? Isn't it better then to have it than to not have it at all? Because if it does in fact help in certain specific situations, then why wouldn't I want it on-board, even if its affects are only for short bursts? Also, doesn't Micron's dynamic pseudo SLC cache seem better than the static caches of its competitors?
Anandtech Micron M600 Review
2.) It does appear older Micron/Crucial SSDs run hot at idle and a high idle power draw is something I don't want in a laptop anyways.
2.) Everything online seems to indicate the SanDisk X300s is using SanDisk 2nd Gen 64Gbit 19nm MLC NAND. And for reference, the Micron M600 is using Micron 128Gbit 16nm MLC NAND. I will only buy MLC NAND SSDs at the moment, I don't trust TLC NAND.
Last edited: Dec 27, 2015 -
tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...
The fact that an SSD has pseudo SLC is an indicator of an inferior design. When non-pSLC performance plummets to below HDD levels in normal use (i.e. using more than the few seconds of actual SSD-like performance that pSLC offers...), that is not a plus - ever. No matter how good the drive may score on synthetic benchmarks.
SE-SSDs: Micron M600 vs SanDisk X300s
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by davidricardo86, Dec 26, 2015.