The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    SSD + mSATA SSD?

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by Anggrian, May 23, 2013.

  1. Anggrian

    Anggrian Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    341
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    say if you already have an SSD as the main storage of your notebook, would you still need mSATA SSD for caching?
     
  2. Fahid

    Fahid Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    short answer: NO
    Long Answer: There is no need of extra mSATA SSD when main storage in your laptop is SSD :biggrin:
     
  3. Jarhead

    Jarhead 恋の♡アカサタナ

    Reputations:
    5,036
    Messages:
    12,168
    Likes Received:
    3,133
    Trophy Points:
    681
    No, you don't need a cache drive at all if you already have a SSD as an OS/program drive. But, you could get a mSATA and use it as a second drive in your system, either putting your OS/programs on the mSATA and bulk data on the SSD, or vice versa (either is a valid option).
     
  4. Anggrian

    Anggrian Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    341
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    But seeing that most mSata SSD drives have lower read and write rate than regular SSD drives, it would be a bad idea to put the OS there and not in SSD itself, isn't it?

    Sent from my PadFone 2 using Tapatalk 2
     
  5. Jarhead

    Jarhead 恋の♡アカサタナ

    Reputations:
    5,036
    Messages:
    12,168
    Likes Received:
    3,133
    Trophy Points:
    681
    It's still an order of magnitude faster than a mechanical drive, and I doubt that you or anyone else could subjectively feel the difference between a mSATA and 2.5" SATA both running at SATA III speeds.
     
  6. qweryuiop

    qweryuiop Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    373
    Messages:
    1,364
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    66
    the only logical setup for SSD and msata is raid 0,1,5,10, raid 1,5 or 10 when you need data redundancy whilst the number of ports you have limited yourself to using an identically performing msata, raid 0 when you absolutely need the speed but have limited amount of 2.5 slots
     
  7. Jarhead

    Jarhead 恋の♡アカサタナ

    Reputations:
    5,036
    Messages:
    12,168
    Likes Received:
    3,133
    Trophy Points:
    681
    Don't really see the point in setting up a speed-optimized RAID setup, as SSDs are already stupid-fast by most definitions and such RAID setups increase the possible failure rates (something like two SSDs with 5% failure rates potentially has a failure rate somewhere around 10% now). And besides some specialized operations that would benefit from 800MB/s+ speeds in a speed-RAID setup, I don't see the point of it when 550MB/s is already really, really fast for gaming and the other usual laptop activities.

    A redundancy-oriented RAID might be an interesting option to explore, however. Though I figure that just getting an external HDD and backing up to there would be simpler.
     
  8. qweryuiop

    qweryuiop Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    373
    Messages:
    1,364
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    66
    I'd agree to your point to a certain extent, however you should understand that although we don't need the data redundancy, some other people do actually require absolute redundancy on their working platform where no risk of unexpected failure are allowed, this happens to a small collection of people, but also they will be in a field of work which is quite important to our society in general so intel needs to honour their needs by providing such options

    I cannot imagine a situation where an external HDD won't be of much help, but I'm sure there exists such situation and thats where those options come in handy, just that we as a "normal" laptop user/ gamer will not experience those situations