Experimenting... or I roll back to 8.9.4.1004 ...
Winsat disk is on strike...or maybe its because of vista... I can run individual winsat commands though...
That get's max performance though I think...
![]()
-
-
-
What am I looking at in the link?
I don't want Windows 7 - its essentially the same as Vista (in its core components) and too much trouble for a lazy person like me on a Vaio
I can get Win7 in English via MSDN-AA - that's running on my old laptop in fact... -
-
Boot times - Vista, recovery with some Sony bloat vs. Win7 is the same...
No speed difference.
Only way I will use Windows 7 is if I buy a new computer... my old laptop runs as a server and shares a printer, could run it on XP pro too... but Win7 is newer and works
Vista is a perfectly good OS
Ok, I don't get automatic TRIM, but its not much of a problem on the Intel drives anyway
I survived through - hmm, 300GB or more of use without TRIM, so no worry.
I think I'll got back to 8.9.4.1004 - makes me feel better too
Thanks everybody
PS: And sort out that "IDE reading" its not right -
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Windows-7-Boot-Performance-Under-15-Seconds-92734.shtml
-
Best one I had was logged at 28 off seconds without Micrososft Security Essentials.
With Microsoft Security Essentials I tend to be around 45-50 seconds.
But honestly, do 15 seconds really matter to you?
At this point I don't care - 1 minute vs. 2 minutes, yes, but not 15 seconds (theoretical) vs 30.
Edit:
And that IDE reading - why does it read iaStor on my laptop - OK, I'm in Vista, but it seems wrong. -
-
And if they don't, find some other software.
For me Vista runs fine - so I have no reason to change to Windows7 which is the same at its core. -
davepermen Notebook Nobel Laureate
well, it just shows how much all the people crying around mlc shortliving are just paranoid freaks.
my use of my 160gb intel grants me 300 years of usage, till the flash will be dead. now if i would use it in a huge multiuser database environment, it sure would be 10x, maybe even 100x as much usage. it would still last 3 years. enough for a short-cicled environment (in 3 years, the requirements for the database will have changed anyways, so replacement to a new, much better ssd by then will be useful in any way).
not that a server uses an ssd 100x as much than a normal pc user. but even then, it would last long enough.
and as mlc is actually rated for 10000 - 100000 writes, depending on the quality, they are sure able to pick the high quality one. so those 3 years would, again, be 30 years
there's just one thing to learn about mlc: don't panik. you can't kill it before it got obsolente. -
-
that every ssd has bad controller ?!?!
can't really see the point, couse, sammys ain't only ones that can go to reduced performance state, ALL ssd-s are
and, if what you are saying is true, than, every single ssd needs a new controller
-
Controllers are important... just talk to OCZ about that. -
Merry Christmas to everyone.
Here's to hoping we get some price dips shortly after the New Years! -
Merry Christmas to all! I have been away, but while I was away, I went with my dad to Micro center and I did not buy my dream i7 parts but he got a 30GB Vertex SSD!
He has a very specific use for it so I really think he did not need the Intel. He will use it to power these http://www.subliminaryartworks.com/ He uses a MAC and cloned his old drive to it and it popped up and booted right away. It is an external drive, so speed is not a factor here. Less moving parts is.
Dave Permen I believe you would be very interested in my Dad's art. He actually has a piece in Switzerland I will find out where. It is a tech science museum I think. Worth a look around his site. The latest few pieces are not up yet.
He did a piece for a disco at DisneyLand among other things. Anyways, was good to see an SSD work off the bat with a MAC and work well. Dave -
Dave - no proprietary MAC SSD's? I remember reading SSD's compatibility problems with macs in the last year or two, but I think they've been straightening those problems out. Good to hear its working for him, now I'll be curious to hear how it works in the LONG run for him, if you don't mind updating us.
-
tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...
No, no bad controllers, just some better than others.
Actually, the OCZ Vertex line don't get to a 'reduced state' far from their optimum 'clean' speeds anyway - they are the SSD's to need TRIM the least (see last SSD anthology by Anand).
Every single SSD needs a new controller? Yes.
One with SATA3 speeds built in! -
Sure Hank, will do. He has it on a USB off a MAC Mini early version. Will let you know how it works.
Yeah, for awhile there was a 100 premium for a MAC SSD at least with one supplier, can remember the exact one. I cold not believe it at the time, Sheesh, is SATA not SATA ???
Dave Permen, the piece is in Technorama in Wintertur, Switzerland, near Zurich. -
tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...
Everyone,
I posted here:
http://forum.notebookreview.com/showpost.php?p=5659530&postcount=2274
how upgrading the Intel Rapid Storage Technology drivers improved my winsat disk scores on an individual basis (WEI overall did not change).
You may be interested to read here:
http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=445747
What effect the disk cache settings had on performance also.
What I'm asking my SSD using friends here is; do these disk cache settings affect your SSD the same as it affects my mechanical HD?
Thanks for any input.
Cheers! -
I'm using a customized Sony Z VGN890FKB, Windows 7 and a Vertex 256GB (FW 1.4)
I have not used the SSD intensely, or done any tweaks apart from disabling disk defragmenter and having disabled page file size (virtual memory) as I got 6GB of RAM.
When I first bought it the Windows Experience Index showed 7.3, and after 2 months of usage, this is now down by 14 to 5.9!!!!!This is both in SPEED and STAMINA mode.
-Anybody know what could be happening? or refer me to the appropriate thread, I've been looking myself, I'm not exactly sure what to do.
These are my first benchmarking results (2 days ago):
-
Try running winsat disk from an elevated command prompt -- Windows 7 WEI disk score has added some responsiveness tests. It is probably capping your score at 5.9 because of high latency in one or more of the tests. Have you considered the GC FW instead of TRIM?
-
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1022/11/ -
How do I install the IRST?
I tried manually updating the SATA controller driver but that did not work. -
-
-
There is a newer version of AS SSD Benchmark that is better at reading AHCI and IDE -- it also has a built in alignment check.
http://alex-is.de/PHP/fusion/downloads.php?cat_id=4 -
-
My battery life is back to normal but performance is still sub par. Guess nothing left but return it. -
Attached Files:
-
-
Hummm....
quick question....
I thought ITGC was actually a process of DELETING data marked as to be deleted but not done yet...
Unless I missed something...
Therefore, DELETING is NOT WRITING....
Unless I missed something...
Unless we consider deleting = writing
But whatever you choose, isn't TRIM the same thing, deleting data (on the fly or not, it makes not difference how long the deletation happens after the writes occured)...?
In which case, TRIM and ITGC either write or not, but are the same process, deleting data no longer valid but still physically present on the cells, which, at the end of the day, result in the same thing, same number of writes...
Might be too sleepy here, but I am seriouslyLast edited by a moderator: May 8, 2015 -
davepermen Notebook Nobel Laureate
-
AS SSD Benchmark scores are heavily weighted in favor of 4k and queue depth 64 4k reads and writes. The over emphasis on these measurements goes back to the days prior to GC and TRIM. If a drive doesn't have GC or TRIM it quickly gets filled up with data regardless of how much free space the OS shows. Once the drive is filled up with data that only the controller sees, it has to perform an erase everytime a write is made. Eventually all writes would become small and random so the SSD with the best small random write performance is the best drive. GC and TRIM changes that metric -- if performance can be maintained with GC and TRIM how much 4k random write performance is overkill?
I like winsat disk in Windows 7 because it puts most of its score weighting on responsiveness. While AS SSD benchmarks access time, it isn't even included in the score. -
davepermen Notebook Nobel Laureate
nice stuff
will be, most likely, at the verkehrshaus, or at the.. heureka? or how that got called. we have two big scientific-based museums in switzerland. one about science, the other about evolution of traffic (but it has much more)
-
davepermen Notebook Nobel Laureate
-
davepermen Notebook Nobel Laureate
-
So, Tiller, your theory just got bumped, wanna try a second guess? -
-
davepermen Notebook Nobel Laureate
haha
his theory gives is not 100% wrong, though. due to the fact that the ssd gets more time to spare on optimizing, and not just last-second-that-should-be-clean-we-have-to-write-data, it can organize data a bit more intelligent, and thus create some additional writes etc.
but mostly, it's just a shifting of WHEN what happens. not how much, not if, nothing of that kind. -
Then you should be able to install the newer ones.
Or install them via the device manager. -
Attached Files:
-
-
davepermen Notebook Nobel Laureate
i have so no clue -
-
-
davepermen Notebook Nobel Laureate
--------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 2.2 (C) 2007-2008 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
--------------------------------------------------
Sequential Read : 224.868 MB/s
Sequential Write : 72.385 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 183.445 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 73.614 MB/s
Random Read 4KB : 12.614 MB/s
Random Write 4KB : 29.572 MB/s
Test Size : 100 MB
Date : 2009/12/26 16:13:01
i clicked series 6. without a reason. i liked the bigger number -
http://alex-is.de/PHP/fusion/downloads.php?cat_id=4 -
-
Attached Files:
-
-
davepermen Notebook Nobel Laureate
vostro:
AS SSD Benchmark 1.4.3645.3568
------------------------------
Name: INTEL SSDSA1MH160G1GN
Firmware: 045C
Controller: iaStor
Offset: 103424 K - OK
Größe: 149.05 GB
Datum: 26.12.2009 16:22:34
------------------------------
Sequentiell:
------------------------------
Lesen: 213.99 MB/s
Schreiben: 67.22 MB/s
------------------------------
4K:
------------------------------
Lesen: 11.75 MB/s
Schreiben: 26.66 MB/s
------------------------------
4K-64Threads:
------------------------------
Lesen: 126.95 MB/s
Schreiben: 48.22 MB/s
------------------------------
Zugriffszeiten:
------------------------------
Lesen: 0.240 ms
Schreiben: 0.157 ms
------------------------------
Score:
------------------------------
Lesen: 160
Schreiben: 82
Gesamt: 320
------------------------------ -
-
davepermen Notebook Nobel Laureate
g2 is not yet installed, have some hw issues with hy home server, so i can't restore my system to the new disk..
it looks like the mainboard is dead of my home server
SSD Thread (Benchmarks, Brands, News, and Advice)
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by Greg, Oct 29, 2009.