The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Samsung PM841 512GB

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by vinuneuro, Feb 18, 2014.

  1. vinuneuro

    vinuneuro Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    486
    Messages:
    2,232
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Is this the same as an 840 or 840 Pro or unrelated? I bought a machine that has this drive. I don't have any use for it so in selling it I'm wondering if it can also be advertised as one of the two consumer drives.
     
  2. baii

    baii Sone

    Reputations:
    1,420
    Messages:
    3,925
    Likes Received:
    201
    Trophy Points:
    131
    The 841 should be equivalent to a evo 840 (TLC nand) if I am not mistaken. msata I believe?
     
  3. oled

    oled Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    221
    Messages:
    587
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    41
    Rather unrelated:
    - it hasn't officially made it's way into the retail market
    - it isn't supported by Samsung Magician software.

    I have no idea about technical similarities to the 840 series though. There is also a PM851 Series successor.


    Why don't you have no use for it? Do you own a 1TB Evo?
     
  4. vinuneuro

    vinuneuro Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    486
    Messages:
    2,232
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    66
    It's a regular 2.5" SATA drive. I neither need the speed nor capacity. The Intel 320 160gb is still serving me fine.
     
  5. Bullrun

    Bullrun Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    545
    Messages:
    1,171
    Likes Received:
    494
    Trophy Points:
    101
  6. Unit Igor

    Unit Igor Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    58
    Messages:
    236
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Its SSD with 840 Basic TLC NAND and MDX Samsung PRO controller ,which is slower 100mhz from EVO controller.
    Do you need lower power consumption? because if you do ,you may be surprised how much power consumption went down in last two years.
    I will not confirm but i would try if i were on your place.
     
  7. vinuneuro

    vinuneuro Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    486
    Messages:
    2,232
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Thanks for that info. There are some drives other than Samsung I prefer for power consumption. The Samsung's tend to have low idle consumption like many of them, but the consumption under load is a bit higher than ones like Toshiba Q Series.
     
  8. Unit Igor

    Unit Igor Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    58
    Messages:
    236
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I didn't know Toshiba is good with power.I saw now.
    Samsung 840 Basic and Toshiba are about same in power consumption but what i am confused is that EVO is not so good.
    5078_66_samsung_840_250gb_ssd_review_full.png
    6057_78_toshiba_q_series_pro_256gb_ssd_review_offers_great_value_full.png
     
  9. John Ratsey

    John Ratsey Moderately inquisitive Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    7,197
    Messages:
    28,840
    Likes Received:
    2,165
    Trophy Points:
    581
    Interesting graphs and not consistent with my own observations of both the M500 and the EVO, albeit the mSATA versions. Perhaps it depends on disk usage during the testing but, under idle conditions on my Samsung NP900X4C, the EVO resulted in more than 10% lower system power consumption than the M500.

    John
     
  10. Unit Igor

    Unit Igor Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    58
    Messages:
    236
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    31
    No ,your observations are good.
    I talk to Chris from TT and he tested EVO msata 1TB but he didn't made graf.EVO 1tb msata manage to get 291 minutes.So it seems EVO msata is better then his 2.5" brother ,i dont know why.
    I bet 250GB version of EVO msata would last at least 310 minutes what would be record.
    They had 120Gb version in review but they never made power test.Which is really something i would love to see.I think that for msata reviews power consumption is more important then few more mb/s in chart that some SSD gives.
    There is one review site with biggest msata review base,they even have Samsung PM841 review ,but its useless ,they don't have any kind of power consumption test.