The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Standard LCD Panel vs 95% NTSC Upgrade

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by TwinTurbo, Mar 14, 2012.

  1. TwinTurbo

    TwinTurbo Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    92
    Messages:
    148
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I've tried searching, but I haven't really found a lot of information regarding the difference between the standard LCD panel in, for example, an MSI 16F2 or Clevo P151 versus the upgraded 95% NTSC CG panel.

    The laptop I have now has a terrible panel with a poor viewing angle, and I would gladly pay a little more for a better panel in my next laptop. My primary uses will be gaming and occasionally watching Blu Ray movies.

    Any input would be greatly appreciated!
     
  2. BlackSabs

    BlackSabs Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    177
    Messages:
    278
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    31
    You sound like me a few months ago. I was coming from Asus G50vt-x1 (1366 x 768) Everyone under the sun was telling to spend the money for a screen update from the stock 1080 in the 1761. My logic was the stock is a huge upgrade in itself. Money well saved! The stock screen is leaps and bounds better than my old. Don't think i would of appreciated the upgraded screen as much as i should have. Next time around i get to experience another upgrade.

    I believe the stock is 60% gamut on most 1080 stock screens. Don't quote me n that though.
     
  3. TwinTurbo

    TwinTurbo Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    92
    Messages:
    148
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I knew I couldn't be the only one! I really don't have a problem spending the money as long as it's worth it.
     
  4. Charles P. Jefferies

    Charles P. Jefferies Lead Moderator Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    22,339
    Messages:
    36,639
    Likes Received:
    5,075
    Trophy Points:
    931
    The screen is one of if not the most important parts of a notebook; there is not a moment you'll be using the notebook *without* looking at the screen. Pretty big return on investment, I'd say; just about anybody can appreciate a nice colorful screen.

    Most notebook screens are in the lower side of 60-70% gamut. The 1366x768 screens are almost all poor. I would absolutely advise spending the money for the upgrade. :)

    Keep in mind the higher-gamut panel is only going to help with colors (and likely contrast); viewing angles are not going to improve much if at all since it's the same type of panel (TN). To get nearly perfect viewing angles, you need to step up to an IPS or PVA panel, both of which are extremely rare and expensive. The workstation-class HP EliteBooks and Dell Precision Mobile Workstations have IPS. The Apple iPad is a good example of an IPS screen too. I paid $580 for the IPS upgrade on my EliteBook from the standard 1680x1050 display. Very pricey but I would buy it a hundred times over.
     
  5. TwinTurbo

    TwinTurbo Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    92
    Messages:
    148
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Thanks for the information, Charles. :)

    I'll definitely be going with a 1920x1080 panel, and I think you just talked me into getting the upgrade. I agree that it is one of the most often used and important parts of a notebook.

    Regarding the viewing angle, I can live with something less than IPS quality, but I just can't handle the atrociously bad viewing angle and poor color reproduction of my current 1366x768 panel (HPdv6t IIRC). I've heard that the standard 1920x1080 panels are better than most standard 1366x768 panels in that regard.