The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Switching to a SSD for my notebook

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by Pro58v, Apr 1, 2013.

  1. Pro58v

    Pro58v Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Hello,

    I have an oldish vaio bz11xn notebook with the following specs: Sony : Specification for VGN-BZ11XN | VGN-BZ11XN technical specifications and I'd like to replace my current HDD (200GB 5400rpm) with an SSD.
    I have a couple of choices that are within my price range and I'd like some opinions about those from more expert users. The size I'm looking into is 120-128GB.

    * Sandisk EXTREME SDSSDX
    * Intel SSDSC2CW120A3K5
    * Samsung MZ-7PD128BW

    Out of these Intel is the most expensive (150euro's), followed by samsung (130) and sandisk (110). Which one should I get?
     
  2. Pro58v

    Pro58v Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    I wrote this in a hurry and didn't look at the interface - the notebook has SATA interface (so 1.5Gb/s). What would make a good SSD for this machine? Most importantly, is it worth it?
     
  3. tilleroftheearth

    tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...

    Reputations:
    5,398
    Messages:
    12,692
    Likes Received:
    2,717
    Trophy Points:
    631
    I can't recommend any of these - much too small (capacity-wise).

    For an older system, an Intel 320 Series 160GB (or larger) would be ideal imo. Low power usage, with performance to match the slower/older interface.

    See:
    http://forum.notebookreview.com/sol...amsung-840-sandisk-extreme-2.html#post9144309


    Save your money for a real SSD (240/256GB capacity or larger). You need ~25GB free space (assuming Win7/8 O/S), ~30% 'unallocated' (to keep the performance you paid for sustained, over time) and ~ 50GB-100GB for O/S and data needs. A 120GB (nominal, ~111GB usable) SSD is just a tease at this point in 2013.

    Look for the Crucial M500 Series with larger capacity yet (hopefully) more affordable options soon - not to mention real world performance at double what your current choices offer.

    Good luck.
     
  4. robs10

    robs10 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    16
    Messages:
    311
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    31
    A question...for a laptop where it's the only drive, I agree...120GB sounds way too small. But do you think that would be enough for just Windows 7 Pro 64 + Programs? Looking at my C drive, I have 35.9 GB between Windows, Program Files, Program Files x86, Intel, Program Data, Perf Logs, System Volume...all my My Docs, Photos, Music, and all Users files etc. would stay on my old 500GB HDD. What do you think?
     
  5. Marksman30k

    Marksman30k Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    2,080
    Messages:
    1,068
    Likes Received:
    180
    Trophy Points:
    81
    the older Intel 320 SSDs were incredibly agile vs all the SATAII SSDs. While they weren't the fastest at sequential speeds, they had wicked Random performance plus they virtually never stuttered or showed any latency issues. Plus, they seem to be the only drives on the market atm outside of enterprise models that have sudden power loss protection.

    That being said, you also have to make a decision whether you'll keep the machine for much longer. It may do well to purchase something robust like a Samsung 840 pro and such in anticipation for a newer machine
     
  6. tilleroftheearth

    tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...

    Reputations:
    5,398
    Messages:
    12,692
    Likes Received:
    2,717
    Trophy Points:
    631

    Yeah - I still think 120GB is too small for an SSD. Just the nature of the beast...

    The smaller drives have nand that is not interleave optimized, may not have all the channels fully populated, and the firmware is definitely optimized for the larger capacities... Yeah - just too many concessions to make to simply say 'I have an SSD in my system'...

    It's like buying a Yugo in the '80's... you got a 'full-sized' car with many of the bells and whistles 'real' cars had - but they only lasted for 1/5th of the time of a 'real' car for only saving 20%-50% of the $$$.

    Right now, SSD's smaller than 240/250/256GB capacity are the Yugo's of the tech world - definitely in the 'do not touch with a 10 foot pole' department if you value your hard earned cash.


    In a few days/weeks with the Crucial M500 coming out... the sweet spot will be 480/512GB capacity - but only for the M500 and the M4 $$-wise (and only for the M500 performance-wise).


    All we can hope for is that the M500 will be as bullet-proof as the M4's are and that the prices will be low enough to get other players to offer new SSD's at the same level of capacity/performance and price too... Soon!
     
  7. kayphoonstar

    kayphoonstar Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    173
    Messages:
    73
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    If you consider that it is a simple task to move the SSD to a new system, should you decide to upgrade you Notebook, you can think of your SSD purchase as a separate investment.

    I got a Samsung 830 that I initially put into my 3 year old (Sata II) Vaio. When I upgraded to a new laptop, the Samsung was the only thing that was a simple transfer to my new, modern machine.
     
  8. mikeyhd

    mikeyhd Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    104
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    SSD disk you can keep transfering to new machine and the price has gone way down over the last few years, that is my feeling. It's a good investment

    Under 256GB, I can't imagine it workable unless you have a second SSD

    When I did but the Crucial M4 512GB af first it's nearly 800+Tax, now it's more in the $550 range
     
  9. JOSEA

    JOSEA NONE

    Reputations:
    4,013
    Messages:
    3,521
    Likes Received:
    170
    Trophy Points:
    131
    OP Does the BIOS on your computer have any limitation AFA hard drive size?
     
  10. J.Dre

    J.Dre Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    3,700
    Messages:
    8,323
    Likes Received:
    3,820
    Trophy Points:
    431
    You are the only person I have seen mention allocating 30% to sustain the life of the SSD. Do you know how much longer (on average) it actually lasts? 30% of an SSD is quite a lot to leave unallocated.

    J.Dre
     
  11. MenelikSams

    MenelikSams Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    81
    Messages:
    56
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Could like a huge "Tax" to pay for increased performance, and actually makes the device 30% more expensive in real terms, is this really needed ? :/
     
  12. Encrypted11

    Encrypted11 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    137
    Messages:
    317
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Also, Intel 320's 8MB issue hasn't been completely fixed. Just today, a friend who bought an Intel 320 days ago caught the 8MB bug, despite the firmware update which attempts to address the issue. I do not see why this is a sound buy.

    The other 3 SSDs definitely seem a lot better on the reliability stand point.