The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    T2250 vs. T5250

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by Ragnarokender, Sep 20, 2007.

  1. Ragnarokender

    Ragnarokender Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    T2250: 2MB cache/1.73GHz/533Mhz FSB (Core Duo I believe)
    T5250: 2MB cache/1.5GHz/667Mhz FSB (Core 2 Duo I believe)

    Yes I read the sticky and the CPU guide but these two werent listed. From what I gathered, they are approximately equal (though I would suspect 5250 is superior seeing as how its a higher number).

    Seriously doubt there is going to be any noticeable difference in performance but I'm just confused at why the clock speed would drop in a newer model, does the equally small increase in FSB equate/surpass the difference?

    Just for the reference, I had the 2250 on my inspiron 6400 and im getting the t5250 on my new inspiron 1520 (the old one sort of broke). I wouldve got the T7300 but it wasnt available for Canada.
     
  2. odin243

    odin243 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    862
    Messages:
    6,223
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    The clock speed is lower because it's a budget processor, whereas the Core Duo is higher up in the lineup. The Core Duo has a higher multiplier and lower FSB, so it will probably be slightly faster in CPU intensive activities, but slightly worse for things like powering an Integrated Graphics solution. Overall your experience on the two processors will be very similar.
     
  3. Lithus

    Lithus NBR Janitor

    Reputations:
    5,504
    Messages:
    9,788
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    You must of missed it, but they are listed. I'm pretty sure I've got all the popular CPUs on that guide.
     
  4. odin243

    odin243 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    862
    Messages:
    6,223
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    No Lithus, the T5250 is listed but you must've forgotten the T2250.
     
  5. powerpack

    powerpack Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    7,101
    Messages:
    5,757
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The C2D should compare to the CD because it is more efficient with it's clocks. If you have PC5300/5400 RAM a little boost there. And C2D is 64bit. So yea minimal improvement if at all real world.
     
  6. Lithus

    Lithus NBR Janitor

    Reputations:
    5,504
    Messages:
    9,788
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    That one's listed in bulk.
     
  7. moon angel

    moon angel Notebook Virtuoso NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    2,011
    Messages:
    2,777
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    56
    If the price is the same get the T5250. If the T5250 is more expensive get the T2250. Performance will be around the same, no noticeable difference but the T5250 has 64 bit which is a tad more futureproof.
     
  8. John Ratsey

    John Ratsey Moderately inquisitive Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    7,197
    Messages:
    28,841
    Likes Received:
    2,166
    Trophy Points:
    581
    I recall discussion in the Samsung R20 thread comparing the T2250 and T5300 (1.66GHz) CPUs. User reports and tests indicated very little overall performance difference.

    I would therefore expect the T2250 to out-perform the T5250. The T5250 will run a 64-bit operating system. If you don't want that capability then the T2250 provides much better value.

    John