The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    T2400 vs. L2400

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by abay84, Mar 15, 2006.

  1. abay84

    abay84 Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    57
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    EDIT: Of course I'm referring to the T2300, which is clocked at the same speed as L2400

    According to this table found on the internet, the L2400 has less than half the powerconsumption compared to the T2300... has to make you wonder - is the L2400 simply a better processor, seeing as they're both clocked at 1,66 ghz, or is there a difference in performance?

    Does a anyone know, or have a link to benchmarks? I haven't been able to find any comprehensive Core Duo test yet... at least not one containing both the T2300 and the L2400!

    T2600 (2.16 GHz, 31 W)
    T2500 (2.00 GHz, 31 W)
    T2400 (1,83 GHz, 31 W)
    T2300 (1,66 GHz, 31 W)
    L2400 LV (1,66 GHz, 15 W)
    L2300 LV (1,50 GHz, 15 W)
     
    abay84, Mar 15, 2006
    #1
  2. miner

    miner Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    1,326
    Messages:
    7,137
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    They share the same performance. The L series is made to be run at a lower voltage and thu have better thermal specification. It is more like the ML and MT series among the Turions. Atmost you will see little difference between those 2.
     
    miner, Mar 15, 2006
    #2
  3. Brigand21

    Brigand21 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    17
    Messages:
    172
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I haven't compared these processors either, but it's likely the LV versions have a lower lvl2 Cache.
     
    Brigand21, Mar 15, 2006
    #3
  4. miner

    miner Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    1,326
    Messages:
    7,137
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    No, they are the same.
     
    miner, Mar 15, 2006
    #4