Roughly same clock speed, so is the price jump worth it?
I'm tryin' to minimize the cost everywhere possible.
-
-
T5750 - Go for it if on a tight budget....
^
T7250 - The extra 133MHz FSB won't make much of a difference in the overall experience (a negligible increase), not even in CPU-intensive tasks (Photo-editing, audio/video encoding/decoding, etc)....(and ram will run at 667MHz despite the 800MHz FSB)
^^
T8100 - Again the extra 1MB L2 cache and 133MHz FSB won't make much of a difference in the overall experience, except in CPU-intensive tasks....though a Penryn is said to run a bit cooler and provide more battery life than a Merom....but again won't make much of a difference..!!
And all share same features such as EIST, XD-Bit....etc (SSE4.1 was added to Penryns)
For a better overall computing experience, go for about 2-3GB ram and a faster HDD.... -
So the ~€150 gap really isn't worth it?
For that I can get a WLED screen, upgrade to 320gig HD, and upgrade to 4gig RAM... -
get the t7250. any t5xxx is too sucky for me
-
If you do run CPU intensive stuff go for the T8100, it's quite a bit faster: http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_list.php -
-
On the XPS M1330:
WLED = €80
HD (250 -> 320) = €30
3 -> 4gig RAM (3 is standard on the red) = € 30
€140
T5750 vs T7250 vs T8100?
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by purplegreendave, Jul 16, 2008.