The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    T9300 to X9000 Upgrade: Is it worth it?

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by Big_Rich_UK, Oct 21, 2009.

  1. Big_Rich_UK

    Big_Rich_UK Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    1
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    An X9000 is around £400.

    I can sell my T9300 for around £125

    Therefore an X9000 would cost me £275.

    Would you guys consider the performance jump from T9300 to X9000 worth the money and worth opening up my laptop?

    I know the TDP of the T9300 is only 35w compared to the X9000's 44w, but the cooling system on my Acer 6920G is amazing and I think it will handle the extra heat fine. My idle temps are 29-31c and after 3 hours of Crysis: Warhead, the max temps on both cores are still only 59-61c.

    Also, I would be using Arctic Silver 5 thermal compound when rebuilding and not whatever cheap rubbish Acer used when they built it :)

    I take it the X9000 is the "best" CPU you can get for the PM965 chipset btw?
     
  2. moral hazard

    moral hazard Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,779
    Messages:
    7,957
    Likes Received:
    87
    Trophy Points:
    216
    could be worth it, I don't know because the only difference I see is the clock speed.

    Maybe you should try overclocking with setfsb before you fork out the ca$h.

    When you open up the notebook, check what clock generator (PLL) it has.
    I might be able to help you get setfsb working if you have trouble.
    See my thread here:
    http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=393027

    What ever you do, make sure you get some really good paste and apply it properly. AS5 is not the best paste available anymore...

    There is a diamond based paste that seems to do a great job.
    But if you already have AS5 then it's not worth buying more paste.

    EDIT: BTW I have seen a cpuz validation of a T9300 @ 3.3ghz and a T9500 @ 3.9ghz. really the T9300, T9500 and X9000 should be the same.
     
  3. Big_Rich_UK

    Big_Rich_UK Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    1
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I've never looked into overclocking my CPU with software like you suggest. I'll take a look inside it when I get home from work.

    The last time I overclocked my CPUs it was either in the BIOS or the good old fashioned way... Jumpers :D
     
  4. moral hazard

    moral hazard Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,779
    Messages:
    7,957
    Likes Received:
    87
    Trophy Points:
    216
    the problem with setfsb is that when you overclock the FSB, your ram may become unstable at the higher frequency.

    You can use spdtool or thaiphoon burner to flash a lower frequncy onto your ram to give you more overclocking headroom.

    Also if you like hardware mods, you can pin mod the PLL to get the FSB you want.

    I can help you out with that if you know your PLL, but it is a little risky.
    Depends how good you can solder tiny things.

    Hopefully setfsb will work for you without needing a pin mod.

    Otherwise an upgrade couldn't hurt.

    EDIT: I forgot to mention, if we can't find the datasheet for your PLL it would be near impossible to troubleshoot or pin mod. So if setfsb doesn't work, we really need a datasheet.
     
  5. Althernai

    Althernai Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    919
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Under the overwhelming majority of circumstances, no, there is no way that is worth it. The difference between the T9300 and the X9000 is 0.3 GHz of clock speed so the X9000 will be 12% faster than the T9300 at the cost of running around 26% hotter and also wasting your battery faster.

    If you desperately need a slightly more powerful processor, I'm fairly confident that for this kind of money, you can build a cheap desktop.
     
  6. sean473

    sean473 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    613
    Messages:
    6,705
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Nope not worth it... overclock T9300 if your desperate..