I currently have a 512GB MX100 but I want to get some msata drives so that I can either free up the sata bay for a normal drive or run three SSD in RAID0. I think the price is right on the 500GB drives. Is there anything to be cautious of with the MX200? There do not seem to be many msata drives to choose from and I don't want a Samsung again. I already have a 500GB Samsung msata drive but it is utterly useless and just sitting in my desk.
-
-
-
-
-
They do look the same...there are some component / layout differences as shown below.
Micron M600
Crucial MX200
The M600 performed better and generated less heat than the MX200, in the same application.Last edited: Oct 3, 2015 -
Crucial is the consumer brand, Micron - business. Usually Micron drives come with more capacitors (on the back side, can't be seen in the above images), reducing the chances of data loss/corruption when the power goes out. Since business, the chips used could be better as well. That's the hardware, most likely there are firmware differences as well. As for the MX200 mSATA 500GB, I have the exact same drive for a couple of months now and I'm pretty happy with it.
hmscott likes this. -
Micron M600 512GB mSATA
Crucial MX200 500GB mSATA
-
The other side. On the top (usually) are the controller, the cache and two memory chips (as seen on pictures). On the back (usually) there are two more memory chips and power delivery/protection circuity.
-
Usually OEM firmware is not turned as aggressively as its retail counterpart. -
I've got a Crucial MX200 250GB drive in my laptop as my OS boot drive and it's performing great.
Thoughts on the Crucial MX200 msata drives?
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by Qing Dao, Oct 3, 2015.