The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    USB 3.0 expresscard help

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by cloudbyday, Jun 19, 2010.

  1. cloudbyday

    cloudbyday Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    50
    Messages:
    706
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I want to put a USB 3.0 adapter in my MSI EX625, but I don't know what type of expresscard port is in it. I was thinking of something like this.
     
  2. G73Guy

    G73Guy Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    151
    Messages:
    248
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That will work fine. If your notebook has a 54mm or 34mm express card it will work.
     
  3. cloudbyday

    cloudbyday Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    50
    Messages:
    706
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    So the express card will fit in both the 34 and 54 type?
     
  4. G73Guy

    G73Guy Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    151
    Messages:
    248
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The card is 34mm so will fit in either socket. 54mm card won't fit in 34mm slot.
     
  5. sgogeta4

    sgogeta4 Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,389
    Messages:
    10,552
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    456
  6. laststop311

    laststop311 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    224
    Messages:
    999
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    your express card slot doesnt support the full 5gbps speed of usb 3.0 though. PCI-e express slots are 2.5gbps
     
  7. TANWare

    TANWare Just This Side of Senile, I think. Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    2,548
    Messages:
    9,585
    Likes Received:
    4,997
    Trophy Points:
    431
    Then it also counts on usage, if the OP is using it for Secondary storage the 2.5 Gbgs is more than ample. Most HDD's will not be able to saturate that.......
     
  8. sgogeta4

    sgogeta4 Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,389
    Messages:
    10,552
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    456
    No HDD will saturate it. Even most SSDs have trouble.
     
  9. cloudbyday

    cloudbyday Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    50
    Messages:
    706
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
  10. G73Guy

    G73Guy Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    151
    Messages:
    248
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    eSATA (300) is 300MB/s. I thought on USB 2.0 people get around 30MB/s real world. That would make USB 2.0 the bottleneck. I have never got above 20MB/s myself.
     
  11. sgogeta4

    sgogeta4 Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    2,389
    Messages:
    10,552
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    456
    In terms of bandwidth/speed: USB 2.0 (60MB/s theoretical, realistically <48MB/s - about 80%) < HDD (typically <100MB/s) < eSATA (300MB/s theoretical and close to that in realistically since no overhead like USB) < USB 3.0 (500MB/s theoretical, realistically <400MB/s). So USB 2.0 will bottleneck HDD, while eSATA and USB 3.0 won't see a difference in performance since the HDD itself will be limited.
     
  12. G73Guy

    G73Guy Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    151
    Messages:
    248
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    USB 3.0 is 625MB/s theoretical (5Gb/s=625MB/s). But yes points still stand.
     
  13. lackofcheese

    lackofcheese Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    464
    Messages:
    2,897
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    While we're on the topic of correcting things, SATA actually does have overhead involved due to 8b/10b encoding. One also has to be careful with binary vs metric measures in these situations, but we can safely assume that all these are in metric units.

    In actual fact, 3Gb/s and 6Gb/s (as for SATA) correspond to 375MB/s and 750MB/s respectively. However, the use of 8b/10b encoding means that the maximum throughput is actually 300MB/s and 600MB/s respectively.

    It's similar for USB 3.0, which also uses 8b/10b encoding.
     
  14. cloudbyday

    cloudbyday Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    50
    Messages:
    706
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Okay I'll stick with eSATA.