The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Upcoming battery technology

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by HTWingNut, Jan 21, 2015.

  1. HTWingNut

    HTWingNut Potato

    Reputations:
    21,580
    Messages:
    35,370
    Likes Received:
    9,877
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Cloudfire, D2 Ultima and Starlight5 like this.
  2. alexhawker

    alexhawker Spent Gladiator

    Reputations:
    500
    Messages:
    2,540
    Likes Received:
    792
    Trophy Points:
    131
    Hah! I know the girl in the first two photos from college - I've been following uBeam for some time, it's definitely interesting/compelling tech if they can get it working right (and provide enough juice for a power hungry device under load).
     
    HTWingNut likes this.
  3. TANWare

    TANWare Just This Side of Senile, I think. Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    2,548
    Messages:
    9,585
    Likes Received:
    4,997
    Trophy Points:
    431
    My interest is the longer recharge cycle life and super fast recharge. This for phones and cars will be a major game changer.
     
  4. djembe

    djembe drum while you work

    Reputations:
    1,064
    Messages:
    1,455
    Likes Received:
    203
    Trophy Points:
    81
    These and more have been researched and prototyped for years. In order to have meaningful and significant improvement in the device batteries most people use, there are two additional steps needed that virtually none of these is close to: mass production and standardization. Without these, all the research and developed techniques in the world, while positive, won't change a thing for the experience of most people.
     
    Starlight5 likes this.
  5. Pirx

    Pirx Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    3,001
    Messages:
    3,005
    Likes Received:
    416
    Trophy Points:
    151
    Well, there's a lot of stuff of widely varying quality in there. As an example, while that ubeam stuff may sound interesting to the layperson, there's no getting around the fact that the 1/r^2 power law will doom any such idea from the outset: A device like that would be fantastically inefficient, and require enormous amounts of power at the source for there to be any meaningful amount of power at the receiving end. In short, a non-starter.
     
  6. tilleroftheearth

    tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...

    Reputations:
    5,398
    Messages:
    12,692
    Likes Received:
    2,717
    Trophy Points:
    631
    Pirx, I agree.

    How I see it; if those technologies are so good, we'd be using them already. Not saying innovation has stopped. Rather, science/scientists doesn't sit still either. What we're using is the best - taking into consideration all the factors needed to produce any tech for many, many people at a fair price.
     
  7. HTWingNut

    HTWingNut Potato

    Reputations:
    21,580
    Messages:
    35,370
    Likes Received:
    9,877
    Trophy Points:
    931
    It just seems we're stunted with battery technology. There has to be much more efficient and compact ways to store energy than the Li-ion stuff we use now. I don't care so much about the 30 second charge (although it would be nice) but more about longevity. I'll charge for six hours if I can use a laptop maxed out for four.
     
  8. John Ratsey

    John Ratsey Moderately inquisitive Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    7,197
    Messages:
    28,840
    Likes Received:
    2,165
    Trophy Points:
    581
    I wouldn't complain about the Lithium battery technology: The Ni-Cd battery for my Toshiba T4400 weighed a couple of pounds and kept the computer running for less than 2 hours. And that was in the days when CPUs didn't need cooling fans because they didn't use much power.

    And I also don't support inefficient charging methods unless the energy is free (eg solar).

    John
     
  9. baii

    baii Sone

    Reputations:
    1,420
    Messages:
    3,925
    Likes Received:
    201
    Trophy Points:
    131
    faster charge, faster charge, faster charge, why need faster charge if the battery last long enough..

    So out of (how many? I don't want to count), only 3-4 address the real problem, a battery that will freaking last longer.
     
  10. TANWare

    TANWare Just This Side of Senile, I think. Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    2,548
    Messages:
    9,585
    Likes Received:
    4,997
    Trophy Points:
    431
    Sorry just plain greedy here, I want a long lasting high capacity along with a 5 minute or less charge time. Forget inefficient power transfer methods other than the one that can charge off ambient noise.