It's not that trivial...
If they both use the same number of platters, then the 160GB will have a 60%
I'm thinking of getting a 5400rpm instead of the 7200rpm due to less noise/heat and better (?) power consumption.
What do you guys think ?
Thanks!
--
-
John Ratsey Moderately inquisitive Super Moderator
Study the Tom's Hardware 2.5" HDD charts. The actual HDDs you are considering may be there.
John -
Assuming both current technology 100BG @7200 faster
160GB good choice extra storage fast enough keep disk defraged and you'll be fine. Many have stated heat and noise not real issue I believe there is some truth in that. -
From the benchmarks I've seen, both seem to be pretty evenly matched, performance-wise.
-
Homer_Jay_Thompson blathering blatherskite
Most laptop manufacturers no longer offer 100 GB 7200 rpm hard drives. I bought my laptop with a 120 GB 7200 rpm hard drive
-
Lenovo thinkpad has 100GB 7200rpm max capacity as a selection. -
Homer_Jay_Thompson blathering blatherskite
-
Seems like they are about the same... maybe 10% performance difference (in favour of the 7.2K drive)
But the power consumption is almost double at idle ....
5400RPM is the better choice (using my priorities)
--
What's faster ? 160GB at 5400rpm or 100GB at 7200RPM?
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by lowspeed, Jul 6, 2007.