would you rather have 2.00ghz processor with 320gb harddrive
or
would you rather have 2.16ghz processor with 250gb harddrive
both processors 667mhz and same harddrive speed
-
it's up to you and your needs. If you have a lot of multimedia files go for the 320gb.
CPU wise if both from the sme family, with the same cache and FSB you wont really notice the difference -
What are the procceser number? One might be a 25 watt and the other a 45.
-
both same at 667
-
45nm or 65nm? cache? if the same Id go 2.0 320GB. If different it would depend on what is different.
-
What are the CPU's numbers?
2.16Ghz sounds like an older generation. -
wow i didnt no there was so much technology details to a computer lol im a noob
-
My guess T7200 and T7400 65nm 4MBL2 TDP 34w or T2500 and T2600 65nm 2MBL2 TDP 31w. And I am almost sure T7200/T7400.
I would get T7200 and 320GB. If all else the same and cost is the same. -
The T7200/T7400 are too old now for new notebooks.
I would say the T5750 (2.0GHz) and the T5850 (2.16GHz)....Both have 2MB L2 Cache and 667MHz Bus Speed.
(SOCKET P; 65nm)
Would go for the 2.0GHz (T5750) and the 320GB HDD.
If there is a cheaper option for the HDD, I would go for that, as one can upgrade the HDD much easily. -
ok thanks guys thats what i went with and now im glad i did. it was for dell studio 15
-
It would have been alot easier for everybody if you would have mentioned the notebook's name (Dell Studio 15) in the original post....
-
Andy good call on CPU I need a refresher course. I can't wait for Intel to run out of numbers. I feel like they must be close.
Which would you rather?
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by kevkev, Aug 25, 2008.