For some reason the core voltages in cpu-z and rm-clock are different. Which one is correct?
Heres a picture
http://i641.photobucket.com/albums/uu138/PCMIKE09/CPUINFOOOO.jpg
Sorry if the picture is bad
-
-
Both are actually. One tool differs one from the next as how it reads and calculates from the information made available via BIOS, chipset, CPU readings.
cheers ... -
Iam confused :/
-
Each tool reports differently. I have yet seen CPU-Z and RMClock reporting the same value for a long time. This does not mean that one is right and the other is wrong.
cheers ... -
It does however, mean that one or both tools aren't reading the chipset info and reported temps properly.
Measuring temperatures and assigning a numeric value it not an subjective or 'I'm ok You're ok' kind of fuzzy-wuzzy feel-good event. If a tool is going to report a NUMBER, then that NUMBER needs to be accurate. -
So how would i know if whos telling the truth?
-
They're both a little inaccurate. You need a digital multimeter to get real accurate values.
Why is it reading different voltages?
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by xxbadboys93, Jul 10, 2009.