Just wondering what the difference is between the intel 5100 and 5300 wifi links...in laymens terms would be great...thanks
-
-
Basically, in short, the 5300 is supposed to give better range and wireless signal reception.
-
great! Thanks.
Next question...does it actually get better range and get reception? -
1234567yes
-
Personally, I'd say since it's not too expensive of an upgrade based on the cost of a laptop, go with the 5300. -
I have been using 5100 for around 7 months and I have never seen a dropped connection (in the cafes, airports, at home etc.).
I think the difference between 5100 and 5300 is more on the theory rather than practice. In other words, the difference exists on the paper but not in real life.
-- -
The 5300 supports a higher maximum throughput (450 Mbps instead of 300 Mbps), provided your access point supports it.
Check the 'Features and Benefits' section on this page.
There should be no difference in how often, if at all, either configuration disconnects from an access point.
Perhaps there are more complaints about the 5100 because there are more people using it. -
Since I own both cards, I can say that in reality 5100 indeed drops connection 'speed' to 130Mbps after few seconds at 270Mbps, and tend to stay there except being reconnected again. While 5300 tend to have steady connection speed at 270Mbps.
I know that not only me who has 5100 with this kind of issue in this forum. Don't know why, maybe because I use only single band 2.4GHz router (with wide 40MHz channel enabled). I haven't tried to compare both at 5GHz band.
But at least I'm not complaining, since 130Mbps is still above 802.11g speed. -
if memmory serves,
the 5300 has more antenna compared to the 5100. -
-
There was a thread that compared the 5100 and the 5300 in terms of how it would improve if the latter was installed.. I heard that the 5300 had less issues and it had better qualities as a Wi-fi receiver..
Wifi 5100 vs 5300
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by solarscott, Apr 10, 2009.