I was doing some reading, and it seems like a lot of people are saying it is worth the upgrade to FulHD. It ends up being $150 more, is it really worth it? I just thought it was resolution that you won't even be able to tell the difference. Apparently it has better colors and stuff.
-
You won't be able to tell the difference unless your content is HD. If you know you'll never watch it or don't intend to, you don't need to spend the extra money. However, as far as I'm concerned, HD is the future, so if you order a laptop without it, you will be limited in your ability to view higher resolution content.
This is only an issue, if you intend to use your laptop in a multimedia application, otherwise, save the money. -
Well I do plan to view hd content. It can still play 720p and output 1080p i think. If I were to pop a blue-ray in there, will the 1080 really make it look any better on a 16 in screen? Also, I heard colors and contrast was better on the 1080 because of dual lamps, is this true?
will i feel pain coming from my 16.0" diagonal High Definition HP Ultra BrightView Infinity Display (1920x1080p)? -
Like I said in the other thread, it depends on whether you can tell the difference between average and high contrast. Many people can't.
The ECO screen is basically a fine screen for watching movies and playing games. The dual lamp Full HD screen has much better black levels, contrast and color accuracy.
In contrast levels your HP screen will be close to the Sony Full HD. But the Sony Full HD is much brighter. In brightness your HP screen will be similar to the ECO screen.
All these screens are measured on Notebookjournal.de
You seem to forget that there is a large quality difference between them, mainly caused by the fact that the ECO screen is a single lamp display, the Full HD is dual lamp. -
well thats okay then, i just didnt want some crappy screen. I am picky when it comes to sound and audio, but i guess i can bare it for $150.
i searched notebookjournal.de for screens and could not find it. link please?
thanks. -
Not at all. It's just that answering a question with as many nuances as this one can be a difficult endeavour.
-
wow, seems like a big difference. i would have def. got the 1920x1080 if I didnt have to upgrade the gpu too. (pointless upgrade)
-
16:9 screen is a DOWNgrade.
-
eco is 16:9 as well....right?
the diff is the dual lamps = better backlight, color contrast, etc. -
eco is simply a screen with one lamp. It is not an aspect ratio. At any rate any "HD" resolution is a downgrade due to 16:9 aspect ratio. I would avoid it at all costs.
-
Yes they're all 16:9.
iGrim doesn't like 16:9 screens but it's the only option for Sony FW. -
its the only option for most computers no?
16:9 gives the looks, the mf are all crooks -
Yes most consumer computers, nearly all, are moving to 16:9.
-
so bottom line, to close this story, is it fair to say the eco is just fine, and looks good, but if you were to put it side by side with a fullhd it would be blown to bits?
hehe thanks for your input, you have helped a lot the past month or so!
-
As I said before, not everyone is able to distinguish between mediocre contrast and excellent contrast.
Some people think their ECO screen looks great, some gladly pay more for a higher quality screen.
The ECO screen is comparable to screens you'd find on average Acer or Asus laptops. -
I'd also take into consideration the viewing angle when choosing an LCD display.
-
ive heard mixed things regarding viewing angle. some say its excellent, some say its terrible.
-
ECO screen has a narrow viewing angle, typical like you'd find on most laptops screens.
The Full HD screen does slightly better. But it is still a TN panel. -
yeah, viewing angle isnt a big deal for me, well not as much as colors and detail.
-
That's because most detractors don't understand the nature of viewing angle vs distance. From a general understanding of monitors, ALL LCDs have narrow viewing angles. However that's only when compared to all types of monitors in the market. As well, it's only an issue when you're talking about large LCD panels used for viewing tv and movies.
In the case of laptop monitors, the distance from the monitor to the viewer is measured in inches not feet, therefore, the narrow(er) viewing angle would be insignificant. Still, some people make more of it than I think they should. -
aren't sony's screens better in general? so by getting the xbrite-eco, aren't you still at an advantage?
for example, if you were to by the standard monitor on an HP or Toshiba, etc, won't the sony's standard be better? -
No, the ECO screen is just an average laptop screen. You can see the measurements on the previous page.
-
grrr...i wish they didnt make you do that stupid 1gb gpu upgrade.
-
Many people are satisfied with an average screen though.
-
yeah I am sure it will be fine. i am picky about sound and video quality though. like i said before, I do not think I will see the difference unless I have my computer beside a fullhd at the same time.
I can always hook it up to a 26 incher at home and get full 1080p out of it. ;D -
wait, so is there any way to upgrade to a fullhd lcd if I wanted to in a couple of years?
edit- through something like this
http://www.screentekinc.com/Sony_Va...ch--1920x1080-full-hd-laptop-lcd-screen.shtml
has anyone done anything like this before, is it worth it? -
Yes, but unlikely it will be worth it unless the machine is brand new. Think about it like this, people have upgraded car engines too, but would you want to do something like that in a new laptop? Laptop computers are not designed for easy screen upgrades. That's the one thing you need to get right when you make the purchase.
-
kingjain try searching for other sellers than Sonystyle. Sonystyle is usually over priced. Good deals for FW can be found on Google shopping and Pricegrabber.
-
actually i got a killer deal from sonystyle.
Component: 16.4" widescreen with XBRITE-ECO™ LCD technology (1600x900)
Component: 320GB SATA Hard Disk Drive [7200 rpm]
Component: Standard Capacity Battery
Component: WLAN (802.11a/b/g/n) with integrated Bluetooth® technology
Component: ATI Mobility Radeon™ HD4650 graphics card with 512MB vRAM-good for games and movies
Component: Intel® Core™ 2 Duo Processor P8700 (2.53GHz)
Component: No additional Video Editing Software
Component: Blu-ray Disc™ playback (Reg. Price $80.00)
Component: Black
Component: Microsoft® Windows Vista® Home Premium 64-bit
Component: 4GB DDR2-SDRAM (DDR2-800, 2GBx2
$850 USD
what i do want to know is where i can get a standard high capacity battery for cheaper than $215. I dont get why they make batteries so expensive!! -
Ebay is good for batteries.
XBRITE-FullHD vs. XBRITE-ECO
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by kingjain, Sep 18, 2009.