The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    firewire vs esata

    Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by billgates54, Dec 20, 2007.

  1. billgates54

    billgates54 Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    hi i am new to this forum
    i need some help

    i have purchased a dell inspiron 1520

    how do i know if it is esata enabled how do i get esata card

    if i purchase a 3.5" external 500gb hard drive (edge) it has usb2.0/firewire

    will it be better than the

    3.5" external 500gb hard drive (iomega) esata/usb2.0

    thank you
     
  2. dmorris68

    dmorris68 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    24
    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    eSATA is much better than Firewire, however your laptop would have to support it, or you'd have to buy an eSATA PC/Express Card.

    I haven't kept up with Dell's latest models, but I hadn't known of one with eSATA support built-in. The only laptops I've seen so far with built-in eSATA are the Asus G series, but I admittedly haven't looked for it either.

    If your primary concern is performance, and if you don't use your PC/Express Card slot for anything else, I'd say go for an eSATA card and drive -- the performance will be virtually identical to internal drive performance. Second best would be Firewire 800, but typically Macs are the only ones that support it. Followed by Firewire 400 (ordinary 1394 Firewire), which has similar (actually slightly lower) theoretical bandwidth to USB, but Firewire uses a tighter clocked and more reliable signal that results in typically faster transfers while using less CPU than USB. And of course USB is the most universal, so it's nice to have available on the drive if you intend to move it between PC's.
     
  3. Greg

    Greg Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    7,857
    Messages:
    16,212
    Likes Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    466
  4. Soulburner

    Soulburner Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    51
    Messages:
    399
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Like was said...Firewire 1394a is only as fast as USB 2.0. 1394b is a little better, but anything using the SATA bus will smoke them all. Multiple times faster, even...fast enough to remove any bottleneck.
     
  5. D3X

    D3X the robo know it all

    Reputations:
    688
    Messages:
    1,666
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Yep. The bottleneck would be the drive if you were to use ESATA.
     
  6. billgates54

    billgates54 Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    thnx a lot

    u guys have just cleared my doubts