Im going to be getting a new laptop, and I have everything picked out except for the cpu. I have a choice between a i5-2410M, 2.3-2.9GHz and a i7-2630QM, 2.0-2.8GHz for $100 more. Obviously, the i7 is better, since it costs more and has 4 cores, but I nervous about the clock speed. i7s always eem to have lower clock speeds than i5s, and I dont know if theyre sacrificing speed for more cores. I I was running just one single core app, which would perform better, the i5 or the i7? (Is the i7 more efficient per cycle than an i5)
FORCE 16F2 / MSI 16F2, btw
-
The i5 is slightly better because of overhead for single core. Might even have the edge for 2 cores too.
What CPU intensive program do you think will remain single core? -
Minecraft? I dont know if any other apps I use are singlevs multi core enabled, but I assume some of them havent upgraded
-
Intel Sandy Bridge Processors Gaming Performance: Part II - Notebookcheck.net Reviews
I was glancing through notebookcheck and found that. If you believe that then as far as gaming goes it doesn't matter whether you have a dual or quad core cpu.
What are you planning to use this notebook for? -
Remember that with current gen Intel CPUs and turbo boost, thermals rule everything. Even if you hack away at the windows registry to override the o/s power settings and core clocking, the internal thermal limits of the CPU will always tend to slow things down (or shut them down).
If you need/want a constant high clock rate cpu/cores, you need to buy a cpu that has a high normal/nominal clock rate and ignore turbo boost speeds.
This would usually drop you into i5 (or even i3!) territory with an external/discrete GPU.
i5 vs i7 single core speed
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by zacaj, Jul 9, 2011.