Hi all,
I am planning on getting a Thinkpad Yoga with a i5-4300U.
But before I place the order I want to check that i7-4500U is not a significant step up, as it has the same core and thread count and is almost similar to i5-4300U. In fact, i7-4500U does not have some of the features present in i5-4300U.
Is i5-4300U missing anything significant that I need to worry about. I will be using it mainly for programming, VMs, and animation/digital art.
Last time I bought a laptop, i5 CPUs did not have hyper threading and i7 had hyper threading, it was quite easy to decide.
I find the new naming quite confusing.
I just dont want to order the laptop and then realize that i5 CPU is missing a significant feature.
Thank you
Yudi
-
tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...
See:
ARK | Compare Intel® Products
You gain a lot of corporate features with the i5-4300U (along with extensive VM support) but you lose 1MB of Cache and 0.1GHz each from nominal/turbo clocks.
If you do not do a lot of VM work - then the i7-4500U is the one I would choose at the same cost. -
And also check: Intel Core i7 4500U vs i5 4300U
-
-
I save around $60 by going with i5-4300U over i7-4500U and not only that the standard clock speed is slightly higher for i5 over the i7 but when maxed i7 is 10mhz faster. Not that it really matters.
I will probably get the i5-4300U for the full feature set, just in case if I need it, like VT-d if I need to pass through devices to the VM. Also anyone know if Intel® TSX-NI (missing in i7) really matters for something like Maya, I heard maya takes advantage of multi-threads.
Cheers
Yudi -
tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...
Small correction: it is 100MHz faster (not 10).
With your programs and workloads and considering the $60 savings I would change my mind and get the i5-4300 too.
I can't really find anything specific about Maya - but with a potential of 4 to 5 times the speed with an Intel® TSX-NI (Haswell based) optimized software and ~40% faster overall program execution - an Intel® TSX-NI enabled Haswell chip is worth much more than a 100MHz bump in clock speed and 1MB more cache for the i7-4500U.
See:
SiSoftware Zone
Hope this helps. -
Tsunade_Hime such bacon. wow
-
Can't believe Intel would sell a dual core i7 with stripped down feature set, considering it is their premium processor in this range. I wouldn't buy the i7 even if it has more cache, just for the fact the i7 should really have all features enabled by default in the dual core range.
Personally I see the i5-4300U as the better processor. -
Anyway, the raw performance difference between the ULV i5 and ULV i7 aren't all that much (certainly not worth spending extra money for the Average Joe, at least), and as previously discussed, that i7 is lacking certain features that could benefit your VM work, while that i5 has those features. So, if your work can take advantage of those features, I'd lean towards that i5.
-
tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...
Intel sells what it can (get away with).
As I've stated above, I would choose the fastest (nominal) option between the two: and that is the slightly higher clocked + 33% more cache i7-4500U.
In this case, the i5-4300U (possibly) is the better processor - but only for the OP's intended workflow.
... -
-
-
tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...
Na na na na na! (runs away zigging and zagging). -
-
tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...
KCETech1, yeah both options are not optimum for MAYA - but if Intel® TSX-NI is supported on the software, the speedup is considerable.
Do you know if MAYA takes advantage of TSX? -
Thanks for the input guys, I will be getting i5-4300U.
i5-4300U vs i7-4500U
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by 987a654, Jan 9, 2014.