Apparently the 4710MQ is very similar to the i7-3820QM, and the 4860HQ is close to the i7-3840QM.
Intel Core i7 4710MQ Notebook Processor - NotebookCheck.net Tech
Intel Core i7 4860HQ Notebook Processor - NotebookCheck.net Tech
Am I likely to experience much difference between these two for creative apps / video editing, encoding, effects rendering etc.?
-
moviemarketing Milk Drinker
-
Charles P. Jefferies Lead Moderator Super Moderator
The performance should be close to identical, given how those CPUs are within 0.1GHz of each other for both base and Turbo Boost frequencies.
ARK | Intel® Core™ i7-4710MQ Processor (6M Cache, up to 3.50 GHz)
ARK | Intel® Core™ i7-4860HQ Processor (6M Cache, up to 3.60 GHz)
The main draw of the i7-4860HQ is that it has the significantly more powerful Intel Iris Pro 5200 inbuilt graphics, as opposed to the Intel HD 4600 graphics in the i7-4710MQ. The inbuilt graphics won't matter if the notebook you're looking at includes a dedicated graphics card though.moviemarketing likes this. -
tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...
See:
PassMark - Intel Core i7-4710MQ @ 2.50GHz - Price performance comparison
See:
PassMark - Intel Core i7-4860HQ @ 2.40GHz - Price performance comparison
Almost 15% RAW cpu performance difference is nothing I would ignore. Especially if it cost only $50 to $100 more over the expected lifecycle of the system.
Always buy the most current platform budget allowing... doing anything else is wasting your performance dollars. -
HQ are soldered while MQ are not, so the MQ can be upgraded in the future. Also, Haswell runs hot by default and the HQ are commonly found on thin and light laptops which makes them run extra hot, so they wont OC as high as the MQ models (depending on BIOS and stuff). I would pick the MQ model unless you really need Iris Pro, but cant tell from the info you provided.
Charles P. Jefferies likes this.
i7-4710MQ vs i7-4860HQ
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by moviemarketing, Oct 19, 2014.