I am planning on replacing my desktop (i7-870) with a laptop (i7-3630QM).
ARK | Intel® Core
ARK | Intel® Core
Which one is faster? Is there a big difference?
-
-
On Passmark, the 3630QM is the winner. In real life, I assume it would also be better.
At these speeds, the processor is not the bottleneck. You will probably not notice the difference unless you use very CPU intensive applications. -
Charles P. Jefferies Lead Moderator Super Moderator
All depends on what you are doing ... Photoshop? Gaming? Details, details.
-
For your daily usage (Internet, Office, light editing, most games), it doesn't really matter. Do you do anything that's CPU-intensive? If not, I see no reason to upgrade to the i7-3630QM.
-
tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...
Uh... Doesn't matter what he does with the system - it will still be more powerful (except maybe in VM usage scenarios), be more responsive (especially coupled with Win8x64 and an SSD) and still be portable - something that the desktop will never be able to compete in.
Highly recommend the upgrade (and if OP needs a lot of 'compute' in his/her workflow: 16GB RAM or more, Win8x64 and SSD (Intel 520 Series 240GB (x2) or if higher capacity is required; Crucial M4 512GB SSD (x2 if needed).
Just make sure that the actual system is properly designed for optimum cooling (to prevent throttling) and enjoy the mobility and power of your new system for a few years to come... -
Sandy Bridge is faster clock for clock than Nehalem. It is everything from 15-20% faster.
Ivy Bridge is maybe 3% faster than Sandy.
So that 3.4GHz 3630QM will perform like a 4.1GHz Nehalem give or take. -
-
tilleroftheearth Wisdom listens quietly...
No it doesn't matter - a desktop is not portable - free or not.
-
Thanks for the replies! I will be using this laptop for gaming (GW2 and Skyrim, which I hear are CPU intensive), painting with a Wacom tablet on Photoshop (which can get laggy on my current computer), and browsing the web (usually have 80+ tabs open in Chrome, takes forever to open Chrome after a reboot). I already have a 240gb Kingston HyperX 3K SSD which I will transfer to my new laptop.
I do need to replace my desktop with a laptop because I am moving out of country and it would not be worth the time or money to take the desktop with me, and I need something portable. My fear was that the 3630QM would be less powerful than my desktop CPU, but since it is more powerful I will probably save some money and go with the 3610QM. -
-
Yup.
Skyrim is highly CPU dependant
Guild Wars 2 too, but I can`t find any benchmarks of it, -
By the way, saying GW2 is CPU intensive is kind of an understatement: http://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Ivy-Bridge-Guide-for-Gamers.81855.0.html -
Haha I'm a 5 tab kinda user. Any more and I start hitting control+w.
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2 -
-
I'm assuming no overclocking. The i7-870 has a typical clockspeed of 3.2ghz. Sandybridge is 5-25% more efficient in IPC while Ivy Bridge is 7-15% more on top of that. Therefore, you can expect an 11-40% improvement in IPC. The i7-3630qm has a turboclockspeed on 4 cores of 3.2ghz, assuming the laptop chassis can fully maintain this turbo speed, you'd be looking at a direct 11-40% improvement in performance in multithreaded and singlethreaded tasks. Whether you would notice is debateable, games like skyrim love IPC so your FPS will improve assuming your laptop GPU can match the desktop one. Tasks like 3d rendering and video encoding will show a direct improvement as well. A not so insignificant advantage of the Ivy Bridge chip is the HD4000 + quicksync, this will absolutely tear through video encodes if you are willing to slightly compromize on quality.
i7-870 vs. i7-3630QM
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by spandexninja, Oct 22, 2012.